It was also written as a retort of sorts to some discussions on Westeros, where I also copy/pasted this review, thus some references to who may love and who may find it more of the same. Doesn't help when I write it after reviewing the latest Eco
It was just that your language was very couched, and gave the feel that you were saying, "For those of you who might enjoy that type sort of story, you'll probably enjoy this one."
Brandon Sanderson, The Alloy of Law
08/11/2011 08:05:32 AM
- 1221 Views
Heh...
08/11/2011 01:34:17 PM
- 576 Views
It wasn't that negative
08/11/2011 05:05:56 PM
- 575 Views
Yes, he's a clearly step above Goodkind or Dan Brown.
08/11/2011 05:54:24 PM
- 518 Views
And a few steps down from Eco, Proust, Perec, and a few others I've read recently
08/11/2011 05:58:54 PM
- 531 Views
Certainly.
08/11/2011 06:21:15 PM
- 488 Views
More ambitious than mine!
08/11/2011 06:42:17 PM
- 548 Views
It might be hit and miss, but the hits would be worth it, if you ask me.
09/11/2011 08:37:16 PM
- 460 Views
Re: More ambitious than mine!
11/11/2011 11:55:57 PM
- 556 Views
I'm not clear if you're trying to reference Dan Quayle or if you're really a complete moron.
14/11/2011 04:59:41 AM
- 449 Views
It wasn't explicitly negative,
08/11/2011 06:05:37 PM
- 516 Views
Like I said, I was addressing a split audience when I wrote it
08/11/2011 06:19:44 PM
- 464 Views
Re: Like I said, I was addressing a split audience when I wrote it
11/11/2011 11:52:07 PM
- 493 Views