It was also written as a retort of sorts to some discussions on Westeros, where I also copy/pasted this review, thus some references to who may love and who may find it more of the same. Doesn't help when I write it after reviewing the latest Eco 

It was just that your language was very couched, and gave the feel that you were saying, "For those of you who might enjoy that type sort of story, you'll probably enjoy this one."
Brandon Sanderson, The Alloy of Law
- 08/11/2011 08:05:32 AM
1388 Views
Heh...
- 08/11/2011 01:34:17 PM
726 Views
It wasn't that negative
- 08/11/2011 05:05:56 PM
723 Views
Yes, he's a clearly step above Goodkind or Dan Brown.
- 08/11/2011 05:54:24 PM
666 Views
And a few steps down from Eco, Proust, Perec, and a few others I've read recently
- 08/11/2011 05:58:54 PM
681 Views
Certainly.
- 08/11/2011 06:21:15 PM
635 Views
More ambitious than mine!
- 08/11/2011 06:42:17 PM
701 Views
- 08/11/2011 06:42:17 PM
701 Views
It might be hit and miss, but the hits would be worth it, if you ask me.
- 09/11/2011 08:37:16 PM
611 Views
Re: More ambitious than mine!
- 11/11/2011 11:55:57 PM
714 Views
- 11/11/2011 11:55:57 PM
714 Views
I'm not clear if you're trying to reference Dan Quayle or if you're really a complete moron.
- 14/11/2011 04:59:41 AM
588 Views
It wasn't explicitly negative,
- 08/11/2011 06:05:37 PM
673 Views
Like I said, I was addressing a split audience when I wrote it
- 08/11/2011 06:19:44 PM
610 Views
Re: Like I said, I was addressing a split audience when I wrote it
- 11/11/2011 11:52:07 PM
639 Views
