Re: Like I said, I was addressing a split audience when I wrote it
dacole Send a noteboard - 11/11/2011 11:52:07 PM
It was also written as a retort of sorts to some discussions on Westeros, where I also copy/pasted this review, thus some references to who may love and who may find it more of the same. Doesn't help when I write it after reviewing the latest Eco 

It was just that your language was very couched, and gave the feel that you were saying, "For those of you who might enjoy that type sort of story, you'll probably enjoy this one."

Some will be surprised that I even read the thing, knowing what I've been reading/reviewing lately

Yeah....though he is somewhat a literary fantasy writer he isn't proust...but though I like literary stuff I could never stand proust. But then I don't think life is meaningless so...
Brandon Sanderson, The Alloy of Law
08/11/2011 08:05:32 AM
- 1289 Views
Heh...
08/11/2011 01:34:17 PM
- 647 Views
It wasn't that negative
08/11/2011 05:05:56 PM
- 644 Views
Yes, he's a clearly step above Goodkind or Dan Brown.
08/11/2011 05:54:24 PM
- 587 Views
And a few steps down from Eco, Proust, Perec, and a few others I've read recently
08/11/2011 05:58:54 PM
- 599 Views
Certainly.
08/11/2011 06:21:15 PM
- 555 Views
More ambitious than mine!
08/11/2011 06:42:17 PM
- 618 Views

It might be hit and miss, but the hits would be worth it, if you ask me.
09/11/2011 08:37:16 PM
- 526 Views
Re: More ambitious than mine!
11/11/2011 11:55:57 PM
- 622 Views

I'm not clear if you're trying to reference Dan Quayle or if you're really a complete moron.
14/11/2011 04:59:41 AM
- 512 Views
It wasn't explicitly negative,
08/11/2011 06:05:37 PM
- 590 Views
Like I said, I was addressing a split audience when I wrote it
08/11/2011 06:19:44 PM
- 534 Views
Re: Like I said, I was addressing a split audience when I wrote it
11/11/2011 11:52:07 PM
- 562 Views