Active Users:1235 Time:06/08/2026 11:29:02 PM
Not quite Tom Send a noteboard - 12/01/2012 05:31:57 AM
The Aramaic is only relevant for the New Testament and small bits of the Old Testament, but Hebrew Old Testaments don't anachronistically translate those into Hebrew. Even so, it's clear that the original language of the New Testament was Greek. Even with Greek, the Septuagint is helpful to have for historical purposes but not strictly necessary.

As for English, sometimes I think the worst thing to ever happen was the translation of the Bible into English.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
I'm wondering if I own too many Bibles. - 12/01/2012 12:08:16 AM 1072 Views
I'm in the same boat - 12/01/2012 12:14:11 AM 947 Views
Just FYI - 12/01/2012 05:34:15 AM 843 Views
I know - 12/01/2012 05:54:00 AM 947 Views
You need a bible that has 5 translations side by side - 12/01/2012 04:16:25 AM 1200 Views
Not quite - 12/01/2012 05:31:57 AM 963 Views
That bad of translations? - 12/01/2012 05:55:38 AM 977 Views
May I ask why you have the NIV rather than the NASB? *NM* - 12/01/2012 09:47:55 AM 410 Views
I think it's better. - 12/01/2012 09:11:58 PM 958 Views
Bible geekery. - 12/01/2012 11:55:48 AM 910 Views
Time for me to buy a green sweater. *NM* - 12/01/2012 11:23:14 PM 422 Views
I only have 4 - 12/01/2012 01:58:13 PM 1003 Views
I heard the Norwegian one had the controversial "Thou shalt slaughter Leviathan and eat him" passage - 12/01/2012 11:24:50 PM 860 Views
Indeed - 13/01/2012 09:49:06 AM 1079 Views
NIV Study Bible is high on my list of Must Haves. - 12/01/2012 08:34:08 PM 933 Views
I'm a little confused - 12/01/2012 11:25:28 PM 871 Views
I shall un-confuse you. - 12/01/2012 11:42:20 PM 850 Views

Reply to Message