Active Users:263 Time:18/06/2024 12:32:29 PM
Depends on what you see as the point of literature. Rebekah Send a noteboard - 24/01/2012 08:14:07 AM
The point is that getting so tied up in knots over the "quality of writing" and if it is <Harvard accent> literature </Harvard accent> or not is foolish.

If it's only about making money, then sure. If Literature is Art, then not at all.
*MySmiley*

Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read. - Groucho Marx
Reply to message
1961 Nobel Finalists: J.R.R. Tolkien - 19/01/2012 09:27:46 AM 1011 Views
It's difficult to assess Tolkien's relative merits then 51 years later. - 19/01/2012 02:41:52 PM 662 Views
Yes, Edwardian prose does not thrill me - 19/01/2012 02:58:00 PM 629 Views
Re: Yes, Edwardian prose does not thrill me - 19/01/2012 03:34:02 PM 487 Views
Re: Yes, Edwardian prose does not thrill me - 19/01/2012 03:45:07 PM 584 Views
Yet Jung personally was contemptuous of Joyce - 19/01/2012 06:41:58 PM 464 Views
Tolkein is an excellent example why I usually dismiss literary critics/critiques - 23/01/2012 05:57:51 PM 731 Views
There's a lot more to it than that. - 23/01/2012 07:20:30 PM 597 Views
True - 23/01/2012 07:57:42 PM 589 Views
You can't dismiss his impact, even if you do not like his storytelling. - 23/01/2012 07:40:19 PM 650 Views
Who is dismissing that he influenced millions well after 1961? - 23/01/2012 07:54:27 PM 585 Views
That's an odd argument - 23/01/2012 07:51:49 PM 670 Views
Not really - 23/01/2012 10:35:39 PM 519 Views
Eh... - 24/01/2012 12:40:37 AM 544 Views
Depends on what you see as the point of literature. - 24/01/2012 08:14:07 AM 504 Views
the point of literature. - 24/01/2012 01:30:28 PM 613 Views
NO - 24/01/2012 02:05:11 PM 490 Views
Re: NO - 25/01/2012 02:54:57 PM 483 Views

Reply to Message