Active Users:415 Time:16/06/2025 06:06:22 PM
Deitic anaphora? Jw. *NM* Dan Send a noteboard - 02/06/2012 02:58:26 AM

how is that grammatical for you? i don't know any people who would think that sentence is ok.

"here" has no referent coherent to the sentence - when you take it to mean rafo, the "in america" renders the sentence ungrammatical...because rafo isn't in america, and that makes the sentence disjointed... i'd have said "only by americans is esslemont misspelled here"
Reply to message
Why Esselmont is an illiterate, lazy, MORON. - 31/05/2012 02:24:16 AM 1876 Views
I could point out the irony here. - 31/05/2012 03:37:24 AM 1018 Views
Rants do that to me. Sorry. *NM* - 31/05/2012 01:59:04 PM 339 Views
Re: I could point out the irony here. - 31/05/2012 02:10:08 PM 808 Views
I did write that at like half three in the morning. - 31/05/2012 04:24:29 PM 783 Views
My bad. - 31/05/2012 06:08:19 PM 745 Views
Ahh. I hadn't paid attention to the timestamp of your post. *NM* - 01/06/2012 01:55:40 PM 356 Views
No worries. *NM* - 01/06/2012 02:05:50 PM 338 Views
Only in Amercia does Esslemont get misspelled here *NM* - 01/06/2012 11:42:29 AM 678 Views
ROTLFMOA! *NM* - 01/06/2012 01:58:41 PM 369 Views
Re: Only in Amercia does Esslemont get misspelled here <--- that's ungrammatical!! - 01/06/2012 04:37:56 PM 1239 Views
- 01/06/2012 05:08:06 PM 1022 Views
well, in that case your answer for how could be "because of tn native speakers of engish" perhaps... - 06/06/2012 03:38:03 AM 878 Views
Pfft! - 07/06/2012 06:59:35 AM 677 Views
Re: Pfft! - 08/06/2012 08:06:14 PM 984 Views
Deitic anaphora? Jw. *NM* - 02/06/2012 02:58:26 AM 467 Views
Oh, damn you all. - 02/06/2012 04:13:40 AM 788 Views
Dude, it's because your post sucked. - 02/06/2012 12:43:03 PM 1087 Views
duly noted. - 02/06/2012 01:28:00 PM 905 Views
Pfft! - 02/06/2012 05:00:30 PM 982 Views
I look forward to hearing about them. - 03/06/2012 11:16:51 PM 751 Views

Reply to Message