Active Users:418 Time:17/09/2025 08:34:54 AM
Deitic anaphora? Jw. *NM* Dan Send a noteboard - 02/06/2012 02:58:26 AM

how is that grammatical for you? i don't know any people who would think that sentence is ok.

"here" has no referent coherent to the sentence - when you take it to mean rafo, the "in america" renders the sentence ungrammatical...because rafo isn't in america, and that makes the sentence disjointed... i'd have said "only by americans is esslemont misspelled here"
Reply to message
Why Esselmont is an illiterate, lazy, MORON. - 31/05/2012 02:24:16 AM 1908 Views
I could point out the irony here. - 31/05/2012 03:37:24 AM 1048 Views
Rants do that to me. Sorry. *NM* - 31/05/2012 01:59:04 PM 358 Views
Re: I could point out the irony here. - 31/05/2012 02:10:08 PM 850 Views
I did write that at like half three in the morning. - 31/05/2012 04:24:29 PM 820 Views
My bad. - 31/05/2012 06:08:19 PM 781 Views
Ahh. I hadn't paid attention to the timestamp of your post. *NM* - 01/06/2012 01:55:40 PM 371 Views
No worries. *NM* - 01/06/2012 02:05:50 PM 358 Views
Only in Amercia does Esslemont get misspelled here *NM* - 01/06/2012 11:42:29 AM 693 Views
ROTLFMOA! *NM* - 01/06/2012 01:58:41 PM 384 Views
Re: Only in Amercia does Esslemont get misspelled here <--- that's ungrammatical!! - 01/06/2012 04:37:56 PM 1269 Views
- 01/06/2012 05:08:06 PM 1049 Views
well, in that case your answer for how could be "because of tn native speakers of engish" perhaps... - 06/06/2012 03:38:03 AM 909 Views
Pfft! - 07/06/2012 06:59:35 AM 704 Views
Re: Pfft! - 08/06/2012 08:06:14 PM 1016 Views
Deitic anaphora? Jw. *NM* - 02/06/2012 02:58:26 AM 488 Views
Oh, damn you all. - 02/06/2012 04:13:40 AM 820 Views
Dude, it's because your post sucked. - 02/06/2012 12:43:03 PM 1125 Views
duly noted. - 02/06/2012 01:28:00 PM 942 Views
Pfft! - 02/06/2012 05:00:30 PM 1018 Views
I look forward to hearing about them. - 03/06/2012 11:16:51 PM 785 Views

Reply to Message