how is that grammatical for you? i don't know any people who would think that sentence is ok.
"here" has no referent coherent to the sentence - when you take it to mean rafo, the "in america" renders the sentence ungrammatical...because rafo isn't in america, and that makes the sentence disjointed... i'd have said "only by americans is esslemont misspelled here"
Why Esselmont is an illiterate, lazy, MORON.
- 31/05/2012 02:24:16 AM
1969 Views
I could point out the irony here.
- 31/05/2012 03:37:24 AM
1106 Views
Re: I could point out the irony here.
- 31/05/2012 02:10:08 PM
911 Views
I did write that at like half three in the morning.
- 31/05/2012 04:24:29 PM
886 Views
Only in Amercia does Esslemont get misspelled here 
*NM*
- 01/06/2012 11:42:29 AM
725 Views
*NM*
- 01/06/2012 11:42:29 AM
725 Views
Re: Only in Amercia does Esslemont get misspelled here <--- that's ungrammatical!! 
- 01/06/2012 04:37:56 PM
1326 Views
- 01/06/2012 05:08:06 PM
1116 Views
- 01/06/2012 04:37:56 PM
1326 Views
- 01/06/2012 05:08:06 PM
1116 Views
well, in that case your answer for how could be "because of tn native speakers of engish" perhaps...
- 06/06/2012 03:38:03 AM
976 Views
Deitic anaphora? Jw. *NM*
- 02/06/2012 02:58:26 AM
521 Views
Oh, damn you all.
- 02/06/2012 04:13:40 AM
893 Views