Active Users:338 Time:03/07/2025 07:57:00 AM
Dude, it's because your post sucked. Dan Send a noteboard - 02/06/2012 12:43:03 PM
And I agree the book sucked, by the way, I could go on and on about how horrible it was in the same manner as you, and happily. I've done it before. And, people tend to be very glad to discuss Erikson on the board. But the thing is, your post was really fucking stupid. The book did suck, but you focused on one superficial and incorrrect problem with it that is easily explained away rather than addressing the book as a whole, and you did it with spelling errors and all caps. What do you expect? You came of as an idiot. I doubt you are, but just the same.

For the record, Krul being female is explained by the fact that Krul as a deity transcends gender and took on a female aspect. It was a bit unprecedented, if I recall the series correctly, but it's not terribly bizarre given Erikson's fecund cosmology, it suggests an additional level of depth to his universe. Esslemont is not illiterate, or a moron, and he helped build that world, with those gods, and those rules along with Erikson, in equal part. He did not make a mistake. You did reading it. The book sucks, though, true.


I know it wasn't the most eloquent of posts but at least someone could agree or disagree. This board used to actually care about such things.

Jeez. I might as well retire from this place. Should I even bother writing a review or will its ligaments and superficial tissues simply be picked apart by uncaring vultures of conformity and apathy while its meat and bones goes undevoured by you carrion of complacency?!?

*sigh*

btw, the rest of the book sucked too.
Reply to message
Why Esselmont is an illiterate, lazy, MORON. - 31/05/2012 02:24:16 AM 1885 Views
I could point out the irony here. - 31/05/2012 03:37:24 AM 1024 Views
Rants do that to me. Sorry. *NM* - 31/05/2012 01:59:04 PM 341 Views
Re: I could point out the irony here. - 31/05/2012 02:10:08 PM 816 Views
I did write that at like half three in the morning. - 31/05/2012 04:24:29 PM 792 Views
My bad. - 31/05/2012 06:08:19 PM 751 Views
Ahh. I hadn't paid attention to the timestamp of your post. *NM* - 01/06/2012 01:55:40 PM 357 Views
No worries. *NM* - 01/06/2012 02:05:50 PM 341 Views
Only in Amercia does Esslemont get misspelled here *NM* - 01/06/2012 11:42:29 AM 681 Views
ROTLFMOA! *NM* - 01/06/2012 01:58:41 PM 373 Views
Re: Only in Amercia does Esslemont get misspelled here <--- that's ungrammatical!! - 01/06/2012 04:37:56 PM 1250 Views
- 01/06/2012 05:08:06 PM 1028 Views
well, in that case your answer for how could be "because of tn native speakers of engish" perhaps... - 06/06/2012 03:38:03 AM 888 Views
Pfft! - 07/06/2012 06:59:35 AM 687 Views
Re: Pfft! - 08/06/2012 08:06:14 PM 990 Views
Deitic anaphora? Jw. *NM* - 02/06/2012 02:58:26 AM 472 Views
Oh, damn you all. - 02/06/2012 04:13:40 AM 796 Views
Dude, it's because your post sucked. - 02/06/2012 12:43:03 PM 1099 Views
duly noted. - 02/06/2012 01:28:00 PM 916 Views
Pfft! - 02/06/2012 05:00:30 PM 988 Views
I look forward to hearing about them. - 03/06/2012 11:16:51 PM 760 Views

Reply to Message