Active Users:198 Time:18/05/2024 10:29:31 PM
It's probably a codification of financial responsibility. Cannoli Send a noteboard - 29/05/2013 01:18:24 AM

Specifically, the part of their culture where all women are considered property.

But... not really? Because owning a woman doesn't mean you own her body or possessions, she gets a share every time she gets sold, and they all seem to have a scary reputation considering they are "property."

It's just very bizarre. It's like having a servant, except that dynamic doesn't really work. It's definitely not like having a slave. You could consider it like dating, maybe?


Presumably, taking into account the northern location, frontier feel and deep wilderness of the country, it was some sort of accommodation of the economic realities involved in establishing settlements. Presumably, Angaraks lacking the Christian family values that got American families to pull together in similar situations, they needed some sort of legal recognition of the quid pro quo of supporting/protecting/not-raping the women who came along. Combined with things like dowry and all the rest of it, they probably evolved this system that was like a business partnership, but applied to a domestic arrangement. It's like having a permanent housekeeper whom you have to provide for, protect and keep (the knife-fighting thing is not much more effective than slapping at deterring a serious rapist or mugger, given that men in such eras were more likely to carry weapons and have experience with sword, spear or arrow wounds) in sexy clothes, and I guess you get the profits from her dancing or other occupation in exchange. Given the disparity in social graces and decorum exhibited between the typical Nadrak male & female, this might have been a good system for allowing them to get to know each other at close range without compromising her marital potential.

Or more likely, Eddings thought it would be a nifty twist on slavery without thinking the whys and wherewithal completely through. I like coming up with explanations for aberrant stuff though.


Actually, all the Western Angaraks have weird attitudes towards their women. Thull women are basically nymphomaniac baby machines (since a pregnant woman can't be sacrificed). Murgo women are kept under lock and key by their families, to make them obedient and promote racial purity. Nadraks have the very strange "ownership" dynamic.

Well, that's weird by our standards, but given their cultural issues and values, they all seem to make sense.

Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
Reply to message
A high-def map of the Belgariad/Mallorean. You know, the good guys aren't too smart. - 24/05/2013 05:59:56 PM 1270 Views
Huh. Those mountain ranges are quite different from how I seem to recall them. - 25/05/2013 12:04:31 AM 511 Views
There was a quick explanation. - 25/05/2013 12:30:28 AM 502 Views
You know... they really are pretty terrible gods. - 26/05/2013 04:45:03 AM 541 Views
Torak was the Child of Darkness. Power boost? Also, he was kind of like the Joker... - 27/05/2013 06:45:39 AM 691 Views
Also: Nadraks are weird - 28/05/2013 09:15:07 PM 498 Views
It's probably a codification of financial responsibility. - 29/05/2013 01:18:24 AM 581 Views

Reply to Message