Active Users:480 Time:03/05/2025 10:29:45 AM
Actually, I do agree that it's a bit overrated. Nate Send a noteboard - 27/07/2013 05:30:41 PM

It's easily his most popular and widespread novel, which is why it always gets brought up first when people talk about his novels. It was probably the introduction to Gaiman for a lot of fans, and it takes his mythology-in-the-modern-world ideas all the way, making for an interesting concept.

But in terms of all his novels, I probably wouldn't even rank it in my personal top five. It's good, but there's something holding it back from being great. I think that Gaiman's deceptively simple writing style is is somewhat less suitable to gritty adult works than it is to all-ages work and comic book work. It's best when used for understatement, humour, and wonder.

My favourite Gaiman novels are his all-ages stuff. They're written so that they're suitable for younger readers, with no obvious sex or swearing, and the main characters are often the same age as the marketing demographic, but the writing remains highly intelligent and his style works for anyone, child or adult. These books are still dark and wondrous, which is why I love them.

If I had to rank the Gaiman projects that I've read, I'd go like this:

  1. The Sandman (comics)
  2. The Ocean at the End of the Lane (novel)
  3. The Graveyard Book (all ages novel)
  4. Stardust (all ages novel)
  5. Coraline (younger reader novel)
  6. Smoke & Mirrors (short story collection)
  7. Good Omens (collaborative novel)
  8. 1602 (short comic series setting Marvel superheroes in the year 1602)
  9. American Gods (novel)
  10. Fragile Things (short story collection)
  11. Neverwhere (novel)
  12. Anansi Boys (novel)
Warder to starry_nite

Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
Reply to message
Thoughts about Neil Gaiman - For a possible new reader - 16/07/2013 06:11:40 PM 1162 Views
I do have thoughts about Neil Gaiman. - 16/07/2013 06:46:19 PM 1011 Views
Smoke and Mirrors and Fragile Things show off his multimedialism... - 18/07/2013 09:24:52 PM 979 Views
Hm. OK, I'll give this a shot. - 17/07/2013 12:11:19 AM 1138 Views
Nate did a great job, so I'll just add to what he said. - 17/07/2013 12:42:44 PM 1040 Views
MY experience was his novel Neverwhere... - 18/07/2013 02:34:22 AM 919 Views
Neverwhere is quite easily his worst novel. - 18/07/2013 10:50:25 AM 897 Views
Just to test a pet theory of mine... - 18/07/2013 06:33:51 PM 823 Views
I haven't read Lions of al-Rassan. *NM* - 19/07/2013 12:06:25 PM 360 Views
I want to learn about your theory! - 20/07/2013 10:15:51 AM 843 Views
Oh good. *chalks up another data point for the theory* (spoilers for Lions of al-Rassan) - 20/07/2013 12:18:32 PM 826 Views
I read Tigana first, but much prefer Lions. - 20/07/2013 12:49:10 PM 893 Views
I read Lions after Tigana. - 27/07/2013 02:59:47 AM 860 Views
I read Lions first - 07/08/2013 04:54:13 AM 776 Views
Re: Neverwhere is quite easily his worst novel. - 19/07/2013 03:49:04 AM 1063 Views
Yeah, Neverwhere isn't too great. - 18/07/2013 07:14:06 PM 800 Views
I love Neverwhere. - 20/07/2013 12:50:10 PM 772 Views
Just read Neverwhere already! - 20/07/2013 04:50:09 AM 883 Views
I have only read American Gods and as the risk of being tarred and feathered I though it was just OK - 25/07/2013 02:22:39 AM 827 Views
I'm with you on that. - 27/07/2013 03:03:53 AM 820 Views
Actually, I do agree that it's a bit overrated. - 27/07/2013 05:30:41 PM 945 Views
I never really liked 1602 - 28/07/2013 02:12:54 PM 844 Views
It was probably the novelty that I liked. - 04/08/2013 05:18:58 AM 771 Views
He's definitely a good writer but not a personal favorite - 27/07/2013 02:24:25 AM 877 Views
I just started rereading Sandman, the first two volumes so far... - 27/07/2013 05:58:12 PM 755 Views

Reply to Message