Active Users:366 Time:03/07/2025 12:21:24 PM
The coilles thing was a big thing Tom Send a noteboard - 25/04/2014 05:56:36 AM

I'm actually surprised that you read the whole thing. It was one of those things where I started writing notes and then saw that it was 17 pages in MS Word and thought, "Oh fuck...no one was going to read this even if it were short and now I've gone beyond anything reasonable."

I could have written so much more about the coilles issue but I was worried that if anyone actually did read it they would think I, and not the author, was obsessed with the topic. Jean has Genius talk at length about how a descoillez man is no man at all. He really was obsessed with procreation. I think it was sort of an excuse for him - if there is a positive result then do whatever the fuck (literally) you want to.

Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Le Roman de la Rose, by Guillaume de Lorris and, later, Jean de Meun - 24/04/2014 03:11:03 PM 795 Views
That is a worthy contender for the title of longest post on this forum. - 24/04/2014 09:42:37 PM 351 Views
The coilles thing was a big thing - 25/04/2014 05:56:36 AM 325 Views
After all your comments, I could hardly back down halfway. - 25/04/2014 08:10:48 PM 324 Views
There were a lot of things I had to leave out, by necessity. - 26/04/2014 12:43:13 AM 320 Views
I'm guessing you've studied Sanskrit enough then? - 26/04/2014 01:04:24 AM 361 Views
I delayed it because I need something to read if I learn it. - 26/04/2014 03:52:57 AM 338 Views
Well, I did read it all and now I am tempted to read the poem in French shortly. Thanks. *NM* - 25/04/2014 11:46:03 PM 174 Views
If you are, a short warning: - 26/04/2014 12:46:03 AM 338 Views
I'm getting a cheap e-edition, so thanks for the warning - 26/04/2014 12:57:05 AM 357 Views

Reply to Message