Active Users:415 Time:15/09/2025 09:31:47 AM
Ice shielding against lasers? jh Send a noteboard - 19/10/2009 07:28:51 PM
It doesn't really sound all that likely. the reflection bit is irrelevant unless someone doesn't know how to direct their lasers... Of course, with lots of faceted surfaces it might be useful, but ice won't form that way naturally, it would have to be carefully calculated. Also, a direct hit would direct the energy into the ice... and eventual chaff would quickly be dispersed in the path of the laser. There are better materials for laser dispersal than ice. And honestly - when you build a spacecraft, the fact that ice is cheaper is not a major factor. Weight factors in too, I believe. You'd need a good thick coat of ice to make it useful, and then propulsion would be a problem. You'd have to calculate the trade-off.


Of course, laser weapons in space seems like a bad idea to me anyway. Or for that matter, most weapons. better to use the energy for propulsion.
"People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realize how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world" - Calvin.
Reply to message
anyone seen ice used as shielding for ships in SF - 19/10/2009 04:35:45 PM 3449 Views
Sounds familiar, but I'm not quite sure from where... *NM* - 19/10/2009 05:03:03 PM 163 Views
Ice shielding against lasers? - 19/10/2009 07:28:51 PM 1755 Views
It wouldn't reflect, but it would significantly diffract... *NM* - 19/10/2009 09:25:16 PM 169 Views
Perhaps... - 20/10/2009 08:31:08 AM 355 Views
Re: Ice shielding against lasers? - 20/10/2009 03:39:25 AM 2035 Views
Well, most spaceships have to go in-atmosphere at some point. - 20/10/2009 04:09:16 AM 391 Views
yep, orbital docking stations - 20/10/2009 05:21:40 PM 381 Views
momentum. Read up on it. *NM* - 20/10/2009 08:28:25 AM 158 Views
there might not be weight, but MASS still plays a role - 20/10/2009 05:21:08 PM 372 Views
Ignorance or sarcasm? - 20/10/2009 09:26:31 PM 375 Views
Chasm City by Alastair Reynolds *NM* - 23/10/2009 01:49:21 AM 186 Views

Reply to Message