Active Users:1107 Time:18/09/2026 12:09:54 PM
well, clearly you did not understand everything. jh Send a noteboard - 21/10/2009 10:55:08 PM
I suppose one could read the Baroque Cycle too, but I sort of feel you need to have read Cryptonomicon before that... easier way to start understanding how he uses his shaftoes and waterhouses.

And honestly I liked it quite a bit more than Cryptonomicon, for whatever reason.

Sorry to shoot your theory out of the water. I'm just in a water-theory-shooter kind of mood today.


How could you possibly understand the stuff that goes on in the Baroque cycle without cryptonomicon? And you fail to realise that it is one of the best books ever - see, your theories can't even hold water, let alone shoot water out of something else.
"People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realize how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world" - Calvin.
Reply to message
Anyone read Neal Stephenson's ANATHEM? - 20/10/2009 06:13:58 PM 1290 Views
No, but I am thoroughly enjoying Quicksilver - 20/10/2009 06:36:51 PM 897 Views
It is at that. - 20/10/2009 07:08:12 PM 951 Views
Re: It is at that. - 20/10/2009 07:10:17 PM 1027 Views
You see, i'm the complete opposite - 20/10/2009 07:28:17 PM 1045 Views
He is most certainly not for everyone. - 20/10/2009 08:08:36 PM 909 Views
I read him in small pieces - 20/10/2009 08:21:51 PM 941 Views
Yep, good book, not his best. - 20/10/2009 07:27:03 PM 942 Views
I agree. - 20/10/2009 08:06:41 PM 944 Views
Oddly enough it was probably my favorite so far. *NM* - 20/10/2009 10:22:51 PM 402 Views
So what is his best? - 21/10/2009 12:03:15 AM 945 Views
Cryptonomicon, most likely. - 21/10/2009 06:30:52 AM 971 Views
I started reading him with Cryptonomicon - 21/10/2009 05:12:51 PM 1019 Views
I read the Baroque Cycle first. - 21/10/2009 09:47:35 PM 927 Views
well, clearly you did not understand everything. - 21/10/2009 10:55:08 PM 957 Views
... Bwa? - 22/10/2009 12:07:09 AM 923 Views
My point exactly! *NM* - 22/10/2009 06:36:32 AM 445 Views
Your point is nonsense? ... Yeah, I guess that's typical. *NM* - 22/10/2009 03:37:50 PM 950 Views
Same for me - 22/10/2009 12:10:52 PM 1021 Views
Me third. *NM* - 22/10/2009 09:23:31 PM 389 Views
You don't have to do a full summarization. - 20/10/2009 08:27:49 PM 987 Views
yes, several times, which is not my norm... - 21/10/2009 02:30:04 AM 950 Views
It's a fascinating read... - 21/10/2009 02:40:24 AM 942 Views
That was one of my predominant thoughts throughout... - 21/10/2009 02:06:34 PM 1025 Views
I bought it about a month ago, but haven't read it yet. - 21/10/2009 04:26:20 AM 1000 Views
I bought it not last weekend, but the weekend before. And then read it all in about 2 days. - 21/10/2009 09:06:17 AM 1235 Views
I feel pretty much exactly the same way. - 21/10/2009 01:58:47 PM 1137 Views
I think uncertain is probably the best description - 27/10/2009 11:26:11 AM 1011 Views
Well, I think he has some ideas of the implications. - 27/10/2009 05:53:01 PM 973 Views
I bought it a few weeks ago. Not got around to reading it yet. - 21/10/2009 01:20:06 PM 942 Views
In that case, - 21/10/2009 02:07:13 PM 974 Views
Excellent - 21/10/2009 03:20:02 PM 1062 Views
Yes. Awesome book. - 21/10/2009 03:00:21 PM 877 Views
Looking back, I can't remember reading it. I one hundred percent see it in my head as a movie. - 21/10/2009 11:29:15 PM 1054 Views
That's often how I remember Stephenson's books. - 22/10/2009 02:34:40 PM 885 Views
That's a great point. - 22/10/2009 05:43:24 PM 979 Views
Snow Crash also has the best named main character of all time: Hiro Protagonist - 23/10/2009 01:39:26 AM 1030 Views
Hiro's my hero - 23/10/2009 05:05:48 PM 1110 Views

Reply to Message