Active Users:650 Time:02/05/2026 03:56:44 PM
well, clearly you did not understand everything. jh Send a noteboard - 21/10/2009 10:55:08 PM
I suppose one could read the Baroque Cycle too, but I sort of feel you need to have read Cryptonomicon before that... easier way to start understanding how he uses his shaftoes and waterhouses.

And honestly I liked it quite a bit more than Cryptonomicon, for whatever reason.

Sorry to shoot your theory out of the water. I'm just in a water-theory-shooter kind of mood today.


How could you possibly understand the stuff that goes on in the Baroque cycle without cryptonomicon? And you fail to realise that it is one of the best books ever - see, your theories can't even hold water, let alone shoot water out of something else.
"People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realize how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world" - Calvin.
Reply to message
Anyone read Neal Stephenson's ANATHEM? - 20/10/2009 06:13:58 PM 1235 Views
No, but I am thoroughly enjoying Quicksilver - 20/10/2009 06:36:51 PM 844 Views
It is at that. - 20/10/2009 07:08:12 PM 898 Views
Re: It is at that. - 20/10/2009 07:10:17 PM 974 Views
You see, i'm the complete opposite - 20/10/2009 07:28:17 PM 991 Views
He is most certainly not for everyone. - 20/10/2009 08:08:36 PM 857 Views
I read him in small pieces - 20/10/2009 08:21:51 PM 890 Views
Yep, good book, not his best. - 20/10/2009 07:27:03 PM 881 Views
I agree. - 20/10/2009 08:06:41 PM 888 Views
Oddly enough it was probably my favorite so far. *NM* - 20/10/2009 10:22:51 PM 374 Views
So what is his best? - 21/10/2009 12:03:15 AM 869 Views
Cryptonomicon, most likely. - 21/10/2009 06:30:52 AM 917 Views
I started reading him with Cryptonomicon - 21/10/2009 05:12:51 PM 968 Views
I read the Baroque Cycle first. - 21/10/2009 09:47:35 PM 865 Views
well, clearly you did not understand everything. - 21/10/2009 10:55:08 PM 905 Views
... Bwa? - 22/10/2009 12:07:09 AM 870 Views
My point exactly! *NM* - 22/10/2009 06:36:32 AM 421 Views
Your point is nonsense? ... Yeah, I guess that's typical. *NM* - 22/10/2009 03:37:50 PM 898 Views
Same for me - 22/10/2009 12:10:52 PM 968 Views
Me third. *NM* - 22/10/2009 09:23:31 PM 362 Views
You don't have to do a full summarization. - 20/10/2009 08:27:49 PM 935 Views
yes, several times, which is not my norm... - 21/10/2009 02:30:04 AM 894 Views
It's a fascinating read... - 21/10/2009 02:40:24 AM 890 Views
That was one of my predominant thoughts throughout... - 21/10/2009 02:06:34 PM 972 Views
I bought it about a month ago, but haven't read it yet. - 21/10/2009 04:26:20 AM 940 Views
I bought it not last weekend, but the weekend before. And then read it all in about 2 days. - 21/10/2009 09:06:17 AM 1183 Views
I feel pretty much exactly the same way. - 21/10/2009 01:58:47 PM 1080 Views
I think uncertain is probably the best description - 27/10/2009 11:26:11 AM 958 Views
Well, I think he has some ideas of the implications. - 27/10/2009 05:53:01 PM 912 Views
I bought it a few weeks ago. Not got around to reading it yet. - 21/10/2009 01:20:06 PM 894 Views
In that case, - 21/10/2009 02:07:13 PM 917 Views
Excellent - 21/10/2009 03:20:02 PM 1009 Views
Yes. Awesome book. - 21/10/2009 03:00:21 PM 826 Views
Looking back, I can't remember reading it. I one hundred percent see it in my head as a movie. - 21/10/2009 11:29:15 PM 997 Views
That's often how I remember Stephenson's books. - 22/10/2009 02:34:40 PM 836 Views
That's a great point. - 22/10/2009 05:43:24 PM 924 Views
Snow Crash also has the best named main character of all time: Hiro Protagonist - 23/10/2009 01:39:26 AM 977 Views
Hiro's my hero - 23/10/2009 05:05:48 PM 1051 Views

Reply to Message