Active Users:241 Time:15/05/2024 07:32:48 PM
Read most of these Larry Send a noteboard - 14/12/2009 12:43:05 AM
Complied by io9.com, the list focuses mostly on science fiction, but there's also some fantasy and horror. There's a synopsis and comments on each choice in the link, if you want to read more. In no particular order:

Acacia: The War with the Mein by David Anthony Durham


Enjoyed it quite a bit. Very good epic fantasy.

Air, Or Have Not Have by Geoff Ryman


Agreed that is one of the better SF novels of the past 10 years.

The Alchemy of Stone by Ekaterina Sedia


Enjoyed this one a lot. Can agree with its placement on such a list.

The Baroque Cycle by Neal Stephenson


Only partway into it. Very good, but uncertain if it'd make such a list of my own at this point.

Confessions of Max Tivoli by Andrew Sean Greer


Haven't read.

Down And Out In the Magic Kingdom by Cory Doctorow


Good, but not worthy of a best of the past 10 years.

The Execution Channel by Ken MacLeod


Read part of it. It was OK, but didn't interest me enough to finish it last year. I think I might have traded it in recently.

Glasshouse by Charles Stross


I tend to have a sometimes violent dislike of Stross' stories. Didn't like this one at all.

Harry Potter Series by JK Rowling


Very good at times, but the best of the past 10 years? Latter volumes were relatively weak to me.

Jonathan Strange and Mr Norrell by Susanna Clarke


Agreed with its placement on such a list.

Look to Windward by Iain M. Banks


Good, but not good enough for me to consider it worthy of such a placing.

The Mount by Carol Emshwiller


Enjoyed this one quite a bit. Agreed on its placement.

Oryx and Crake by Margaret Atwood


It's better than many want to give it credit for me. So what if the author made some silly comments? The novel was a very good tale.

Pattern Recognition by William Gibson


It's OK, but nothing exciting.

Perdido Street Station by China Miéville


Agreed that it's one of the best books from 2000. I just happen to believe that the 21st century started in 2001 ;)

Rainbows End by Vernor Vinge


Good to very good story, but it wouldn't have made a similar list if I had constructed one.

Stories of Your Life And Others by Ted Chiang


YES!

Time Traveler's Wife by Audrey Niffenegger


Haven't yet read.

Tooth and Claw by Jo Walton


See above, although Walton has written some very good alt-histories lately.

World War Z by Max Brooks


Haven't read.

I've only read on a couple on the list (The Baroque Cycle, Harry Potter, Strange and Norrell) but they certainly were very good. I haven't even heard of a lot of the books on this list, actually, but they all do sound interesting.

So what do some of you more well-read folks think? Agree, disagree? What books would YOU put on your list as the best of the decade? :D


Well, I already posted a list of 50 standalones from 2000-2009, but one for multi-volume works will have to wait a while.
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie

Je suis méchant.
Reply to message
20 Best Science Fiction Books of the Decade - 13/12/2009 10:16:32 PM 1182 Views
How can Harry Potter be there and the Dark Tower not ? - 13/12/2009 11:53:10 PM 599 Views
I guess because... - 14/12/2009 12:11:47 AM 646 Views
Oh. Well that sentence was too long! - 14/12/2009 07:48:19 AM 607 Views
I'm kinda meh on Harry Potter but at least I found it interesting enough to finish - 14/12/2009 02:25:36 PM 555 Views
you're just saying that to hurt me *NM* - 14/12/2009 06:14:31 PM 256 Views
Awww. It isn't just to hurt you. - 14/12/2009 08:55:44 PM 573 Views
I'm really struggling to finish Dark Tower.... - 16/12/2009 07:19:35 AM 526 Views
Similar for me - 16/12/2009 12:03:48 PM 607 Views
It's worth finishing. - 16/12/2009 03:02:32 PM 577 Views
I think they put Oryx and Crake on lists like this just to spite Margaret Atwood *NM* - 14/12/2009 12:10:35 AM 413 Views
What do you mean? *NM* - 14/12/2009 01:52:01 PM 247 Views
She's on record as being a bit snobby about Sci-Fi and not wanting to be labelled with it *NM* - 14/12/2009 02:23:46 PM 238 Views
Yes, and the book is bad. - 14/12/2009 06:18:02 PM 591 Views
I liked it - 16/12/2009 01:17:57 PM 629 Views
I agree with her 100%. It's not Science Fiction. *NM* - 15/12/2009 06:47:50 PM 276 Views
She later changed her mind and said it is science fiction. - 15/12/2009 10:09:03 PM 768 Views
Lists are created that we may complain about them. - 14/12/2009 12:31:32 AM 569 Views
Yeah, what he said. *NM* - 14/12/2009 07:27:58 AM 246 Views
Read most of these - 14/12/2009 12:43:05 AM 842 Views
Thank you. - 10/01/2010 01:45:11 AM 778 Views
Double post - 10/01/2010 01:45:27 AM 762 Views
I'm a little surprised The Lies of Locke Lamora isn't on there, to be honest. - 14/12/2009 02:35:13 AM 545 Views
it's fantasy. not sf even by a stretch. *NM* - 14/12/2009 05:52:05 AM 256 Views
and really, not very good. *NM* - 14/12/2009 05:52:39 AM 268 Views
See below. *NM* - 14/12/2009 06:52:39 AM 235 Views
Harry Potter? *NM* - 14/12/2009 06:52:32 AM 266 Views
Re: 20 Best Science Fiction Books of the Decade - 14/12/2009 02:28:29 PM 576 Views
Not sure if I could come up with a ranking. - 14/12/2009 05:28:34 PM 708 Views
I'd say the Scar is more balanced - 14/12/2009 06:18:13 PM 511 Views
Generally agree but... - 14/12/2009 06:22:50 PM 575 Views
Am I th eonly one who always reads Ekaterina Sedia as Ekaterina Sedai? *NM* - 14/12/2009 08:52:57 PM 283 Views
Nope. *NM* - 14/12/2009 11:41:01 PM 251 Views
Yes. Freak. *NM* - 15/12/2009 11:25:40 AM 248 Views
I thought it was a Wotmania username for a while *NM* - 15/12/2009 06:38:16 PM 240 Views
Same. - 16/12/2009 05:35:55 AM 594 Views
Glad to see Ted Chiang make the list - 10/01/2010 01:48:44 AM 742 Views

Reply to Message