Active Users:478 Time:02/05/2025 07:59:00 PM
Yes, and the book is bad. Ouranid Send a noteboard - 14/12/2009 06:18:02 PM
And no, I'm not saying it out of outrage. I read the book before I became aware of the ccontroversy, and couldn't really care. But the book is bad, and considering she has so many brilliant books, it baffles me that this is the one consistently mentioned.

The Blind Assassin or The Handmaid's Tale are better choices when it comes to her spec fi.
*MySmiley*
Indeed, I marry them in their unlawful bed, with an open heart I affirm the true right of any man and woman to their dark slobbering nights which are rare enough, and against which too many laws conspire.
Reply to message
20 Best Science Fiction Books of the Decade - 13/12/2009 10:16:32 PM 1332 Views
How can Harry Potter be there and the Dark Tower not ? - 13/12/2009 11:53:10 PM 752 Views
I guess because... - 14/12/2009 12:11:47 AM 748 Views
Oh. Well that sentence was too long! - 14/12/2009 07:48:19 AM 726 Views
I'm kinda meh on Harry Potter but at least I found it interesting enough to finish - 14/12/2009 02:25:36 PM 696 Views
you're just saying that to hurt me *NM* - 14/12/2009 06:14:31 PM 311 Views
Awww. It isn't just to hurt you. - 14/12/2009 08:55:44 PM 704 Views
I'm really struggling to finish Dark Tower.... - 16/12/2009 07:19:35 AM 655 Views
Similar for me - 16/12/2009 12:03:48 PM 743 Views
It's worth finishing. - 16/12/2009 03:02:32 PM 701 Views
I think they put Oryx and Crake on lists like this just to spite Margaret Atwood *NM* - 14/12/2009 12:10:35 AM 472 Views
What do you mean? *NM* - 14/12/2009 01:52:01 PM 303 Views
She's on record as being a bit snobby about Sci-Fi and not wanting to be labelled with it *NM* - 14/12/2009 02:23:46 PM 291 Views
Yes, and the book is bad. - 14/12/2009 06:18:02 PM 732 Views
I liked it - 16/12/2009 01:17:57 PM 765 Views
I agree with her 100%. It's not Science Fiction. *NM* - 15/12/2009 06:47:50 PM 334 Views
She later changed her mind and said it is science fiction. - 15/12/2009 10:09:03 PM 904 Views
Lists are created that we may complain about them. - 14/12/2009 12:31:32 AM 710 Views
Yeah, what he said. *NM* - 14/12/2009 07:27:58 AM 296 Views
Read most of these - 14/12/2009 12:43:05 AM 972 Views
Thank you. - 10/01/2010 01:45:11 AM 928 Views
Double post - 10/01/2010 01:45:27 AM 891 Views
I'm a little surprised The Lies of Locke Lamora isn't on there, to be honest. - 14/12/2009 02:35:13 AM 693 Views
it's fantasy. not sf even by a stretch. *NM* - 14/12/2009 05:52:05 AM 309 Views
and really, not very good. *NM* - 14/12/2009 05:52:39 AM 325 Views
See below. *NM* - 14/12/2009 06:52:39 AM 311 Views
Harry Potter? *NM* - 14/12/2009 06:52:32 AM 324 Views
Re: 20 Best Science Fiction Books of the Decade - 14/12/2009 02:28:29 PM 707 Views
Not sure if I could come up with a ranking. - 14/12/2009 05:28:34 PM 830 Views
I'd say the Scar is more balanced - 14/12/2009 06:18:13 PM 638 Views
Generally agree but... - 14/12/2009 06:22:50 PM 687 Views
Am I th eonly one who always reads Ekaterina Sedia as Ekaterina Sedai? *NM* - 14/12/2009 08:52:57 PM 346 Views
Nope. *NM* - 14/12/2009 11:41:01 PM 309 Views
Yes. Freak. *NM* - 15/12/2009 11:25:40 AM 293 Views
I thought it was a Wotmania username for a while *NM* - 15/12/2009 06:38:16 PM 291 Views
Same. - 16/12/2009 05:35:55 AM 719 Views
Glad to see Ted Chiang make the list - 10/01/2010 01:48:44 AM 881 Views

Reply to Message