Active Users:627 Time:08/12/2025 07:23:33 PM
Yes, and the book is bad. Ouranid Send a noteboard - 14/12/2009 06:18:02 PM
And no, I'm not saying it out of outrage. I read the book before I became aware of the ccontroversy, and couldn't really care. But the book is bad, and considering she has so many brilliant books, it baffles me that this is the one consistently mentioned.

The Blind Assassin or The Handmaid's Tale are better choices when it comes to her spec fi.
*MySmiley*
Indeed, I marry them in their unlawful bed, with an open heart I affirm the true right of any man and woman to their dark slobbering nights which are rare enough, and against which too many laws conspire.
Reply to message
20 Best Science Fiction Books of the Decade - 13/12/2009 10:16:32 PM 1444 Views
How can Harry Potter be there and the Dark Tower not ? - 13/12/2009 11:53:10 PM 846 Views
I guess because... - 14/12/2009 12:11:47 AM 839 Views
Oh. Well that sentence was too long! - 14/12/2009 07:48:19 AM 800 Views
I'm kinda meh on Harry Potter but at least I found it interesting enough to finish - 14/12/2009 02:25:36 PM 805 Views
you're just saying that to hurt me *NM* - 14/12/2009 06:14:31 PM 353 Views
Awww. It isn't just to hurt you. - 14/12/2009 08:55:44 PM 788 Views
I'm really struggling to finish Dark Tower.... - 16/12/2009 07:19:35 AM 757 Views
Similar for me - 16/12/2009 12:03:48 PM 842 Views
It's worth finishing. - 16/12/2009 03:02:32 PM 803 Views
I think they put Oryx and Crake on lists like this just to spite Margaret Atwood *NM* - 14/12/2009 12:10:35 AM 515 Views
What do you mean? *NM* - 14/12/2009 01:52:01 PM 344 Views
She's on record as being a bit snobby about Sci-Fi and not wanting to be labelled with it *NM* - 14/12/2009 02:23:46 PM 330 Views
Yes, and the book is bad. - 14/12/2009 06:18:02 PM 838 Views
I liked it - 16/12/2009 01:17:57 PM 834 Views
I agree with her 100%. It's not Science Fiction. *NM* - 15/12/2009 06:47:50 PM 366 Views
She later changed her mind and said it is science fiction. - 15/12/2009 10:09:03 PM 1002 Views
Lists are created that we may complain about them. - 14/12/2009 12:31:32 AM 802 Views
Yeah, what he said. *NM* - 14/12/2009 07:27:58 AM 338 Views
Read most of these - 14/12/2009 12:43:05 AM 1084 Views
Thank you. - 10/01/2010 01:45:11 AM 1099 Views
Double post - 10/01/2010 01:45:27 AM 1034 Views
I'm a little surprised The Lies of Locke Lamora isn't on there, to be honest. - 14/12/2009 02:35:13 AM 769 Views
it's fantasy. not sf even by a stretch. *NM* - 14/12/2009 05:52:05 AM 351 Views
and really, not very good. *NM* - 14/12/2009 05:52:39 AM 367 Views
See below. *NM* - 14/12/2009 06:52:39 AM 353 Views
Harry Potter? *NM* - 14/12/2009 06:52:32 AM 368 Views
Re: 20 Best Science Fiction Books of the Decade - 14/12/2009 02:28:29 PM 783 Views
Not sure if I could come up with a ranking. - 14/12/2009 05:28:34 PM 955 Views
I'd say the Scar is more balanced - 14/12/2009 06:18:13 PM 731 Views
Generally agree but... - 14/12/2009 06:22:50 PM 764 Views
Am I th eonly one who always reads Ekaterina Sedia as Ekaterina Sedai? *NM* - 14/12/2009 08:52:57 PM 390 Views
Nope. *NM* - 14/12/2009 11:41:01 PM 349 Views
Yes. Freak. *NM* - 15/12/2009 11:25:40 AM 334 Views
I thought it was a Wotmania username for a while *NM* - 15/12/2009 06:38:16 PM 330 Views
Same. - 16/12/2009 05:35:55 AM 807 Views
Glad to see Ted Chiang make the list - 10/01/2010 01:48:44 AM 1036 Views

Reply to Message