Active Users:141 Time:02/06/2024 02:35:13 PM
Re: No. Camilla Send a noteboard - 29/12/2009 09:51:23 PM
Books on shelves function as CO2 depositories.


First of all, the destruction of trees and all that is involved in that - from the getting to them, to the cutting them down, to delivering the cut down trees, to then the processing of them into paper is all extremely energy intensive. Then there is the delivery of the paper and the energy required to create the books. Not to mention all the energy required to go into the creation of the ink for the paper. Then the creation of the boxes into which books are packed into before being shipped. Then the shipping itself. Then the recycling of the boxes and the energy involved in shipping the recycled boxes.

Sorry, the creation and delivery of books is far more energy intensive than the creation and delivery of eBooks from a server to a computer.


You cannot count the actual removal of trees to taht list, as the CO2 remains in the pulp. Once made, however, the book remains neutral, whereas an e-book reader always requires electricity.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
Reply to message
E-books spark battle inside the publishing industry - 28/12/2009 05:12:01 AM 1357 Views
it makes much more sense to just buy a book. $5.99 is far cheaper than $9.99 *NM* - 28/12/2009 06:22:47 AM 374 Views
Yes, but you're talking about a paperback book, and one that's on sale at that. - 28/12/2009 12:23:31 PM 742 Views
I haven't paid more than $7.99 for a soft cover book in my life. - 28/12/2009 03:13:04 PM 670 Views
Yuo can also be 10th on a waiting list at the library and read it months after release. - 28/12/2009 05:22:27 PM 870 Views
But the chances of something happening to said device is greater than your house. - 29/12/2009 06:27:21 AM 768 Views
You answered your own question. You back them up. - 30/12/2009 12:53:33 AM 775 Views
Depends where you live..... - 28/12/2009 12:24:55 PM 693 Views
I think I agree - 29/12/2009 12:16:36 AM 868 Views
If I were buying a book for mandatory reading (i.e., college), I might consider an e-book. - 29/12/2009 03:28:31 PM 725 Views
A man after my own heart. - 29/12/2009 04:04:19 PM 708 Views
Trade paperbacks are the ones with the heavy covers, right? - 29/12/2009 08:19:33 PM 681 Views
Yeah. Different sizes and all. Fun to organize. *NM* - 31/12/2009 04:19:57 AM 267 Views
you could always take the book covers OFF - 30/12/2009 04:28:18 PM 667 Views
Well, yeah. But still. *NM* - 31/12/2009 04:19:29 AM 277 Views
I dislike e-books - 29/12/2009 03:56:10 PM 743 Views
I love that eBooks are the future. Much better than original books. - 29/12/2009 05:19:40 PM 672 Views
Well we already have audiobooks - 29/12/2009 05:39:29 PM 712 Views
There is a term for enhanced books - vooks. - 29/12/2009 07:02:14 PM 682 Views
Would a videobook not be a movie? - 31/12/2009 06:06:52 AM 790 Views
They are not environmentally superiour. - 29/12/2009 05:47:11 PM 748 Views
No. - 29/12/2009 07:01:32 PM 689 Views
Re: No. - 29/12/2009 09:51:23 PM 760 Views
And what do you use to remove the tree? - 29/12/2009 11:24:26 PM 678 Views
Are you smoking crack? - 29/12/2009 09:21:36 PM 716 Views
Re: Are you smoking crack? - 29/12/2009 09:52:19 PM 704 Views
Ummm... - 30/12/2009 02:33:19 PM 731 Views
prefer the feel of a real book in my hand - 29/12/2009 07:20:27 PM 672 Views
I love my Kindle that I got for Christmas. - 29/12/2009 09:05:57 PM 673 Views
Bitchface. *NM* - 29/12/2009 09:10:23 PM 307 Views
Vagina breath. *NM* - 29/12/2009 09:15:13 PM 286 Views
Vagina Breath : Bitchface as Literatedog : The Shrike *NM* - 29/12/2009 09:21:03 PM 290 Views
I like books - 30/12/2009 08:10:55 AM 622 Views
Sigh. This whole argument of ebooks versus regular books is beyond stupid. - 30/12/2009 11:04:46 AM 729 Views
I agree with you - 30/12/2009 04:33:22 PM 678 Views
I have to agree. - 30/12/2009 04:47:20 PM 786 Views
Yep. - 30/12/2009 10:57:26 PM 853 Views
cost of publishing - 30/12/2009 02:25:37 PM 717 Views

Reply to Message