Active Users:857 Time:31/01/2026 08:30:18 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Double post Jayhawk Send a noteboard - 10/01/2010 01:45:27 AM
Agreed that it's one of the best books from 2000. I just happen to believe that the 21st century started in 2001 ;)


I complained about this ALL of 1999. Almost everyone thought I was crazy, apparently except Matt Stover.

“Myth is much more important and true than history. History is just journalism, and you know how reliable that is.
Joseph Campbell
This message last edited by Jayhawk on 12/01/2010 at 03:36:56 AM
Reply to message
20 Best Science Fiction Books of the Decade Darth_Katie - 13/12/2009 10:16:32 PM 1476 Views
How can Harry Potter be there and the Dark Tower not ? AgentOrange - 13/12/2009 11:53:10 PM 873 Views
I guess because... j-whitt987 - 14/12/2009 12:11:47 AM 866 Views
Oh. Well that sentence was too long! AgentOrange - 14/12/2009 07:48:19 AM 822 Views
I'm kinda meh on Harry Potter but at least I found it interesting enough to finish snoopcester - 14/12/2009 02:25:36 PM 823 Views
you're just saying that to hurt me *NM* AgentOrange - 14/12/2009 06:14:31 PM 370 Views
Awww. It isn't just to hurt you. snoopcester - 14/12/2009 08:55:44 PM 808 Views
I'm really struggling to finish Dark Tower.... Brian - 16/12/2009 07:19:35 AM 779 Views
Similar for me snoopcester - 16/12/2009 12:03:48 PM 867 Views
It's worth finishing. rebelaessedai - 16/12/2009 03:02:32 PM 825 Views
I think they put Oryx and Crake on lists like this just to spite Margaret Atwood *NM* Ouranid - 14/12/2009 12:10:35 AM 525 Views
What do you mean? *NM* Darth_Katie - 14/12/2009 01:52:01 PM 358 Views
She's on record as being a bit snobby about Sci-Fi and not wanting to be labelled with it *NM* snoopcester - 14/12/2009 02:23:46 PM 340 Views
Yes, and the book is bad. Ouranid - 14/12/2009 06:18:02 PM 858 Views
I liked it snoopcester - 16/12/2009 01:17:57 PM 848 Views
I agree with her 100%. It's not Science Fiction. *NM* Joker - 15/12/2009 06:47:50 PM 383 Views
She later changed her mind and said it is science fiction. Werthead - 15/12/2009 10:09:03 PM 1028 Views
I don't think of books like that as Sci fi but I can see the argument that they are snoopcester - 16/12/2009 01:19:45 PM 810 Views
Lists are created that we may complain about them. Craig - 14/12/2009 12:31:32 AM 824 Views
Yeah, what he said. *NM* jh - 14/12/2009 07:27:58 AM 346 Views
Read most of these Larry - 14/12/2009 12:43:05 AM 1112 Views
Thank you. Jayhawk - 10/01/2010 01:45:11 AM 1130 Views
Double post Jayhawk - 10/01/2010 01:45:27 AM 1064 Views
I'm a little surprised The Lies of Locke Lamora isn't on there, to be honest. Ghavrel - 14/12/2009 02:35:13 AM 793 Views
it's fantasy. not sf even by a stretch. *NM* Aeryn - 14/12/2009 05:52:05 AM 362 Views
and really, not very good. *NM* Aeryn - 14/12/2009 05:52:39 AM 377 Views
See below. *NM* Ghavrel - 14/12/2009 06:52:39 AM 359 Views
Harry Potter? *NM* Ghavrel - 14/12/2009 06:52:32 AM 379 Views
Re: 20 Best Science Fiction Books of the Decade snoopcester - 14/12/2009 02:28:29 PM 802 Views
Not sure if I could come up with a ranking. Werthead - 14/12/2009 05:28:34 PM 977 Views
I'd say the Scar is more balanced AgentOrange - 14/12/2009 06:18:13 PM 754 Views
Generally agree but... Jacob - 14/12/2009 06:22:50 PM 788 Views
Am I th eonly one who always reads Ekaterina Sedia as Ekaterina Sedai? *NM* everynametaken - 14/12/2009 08:52:57 PM 401 Views
Nope. *NM* rebelaessedai - 14/12/2009 11:41:01 PM 357 Views
Yes. Freak. *NM* jh - 15/12/2009 11:25:40 AM 341 Views
I thought it was a Wotmania username for a while *NM* Gher - 15/12/2009 06:38:16 PM 341 Views
Same. lord-of-shadow - 16/12/2009 05:35:55 AM 826 Views
Glad to see Ted Chiang make the list Jayhawk - 10/01/2010 01:48:44 AM 1062 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes