Active Users:470 Time:01/09/2025 05:25:44 PM
Double post Jayhawk Send a noteboard - 10/01/2010 01:45:27 AM
Agreed that it's one of the best books from 2000. I just happen to believe that the 21st century started in 2001 ;)


I complained about this ALL of 1999. Almost everyone thought I was crazy, apparently except Matt Stover.

“Myth is much more important and true than history. History is just journalism, and you know how reliable that is.
Joseph Campbell
This message last edited by Jayhawk on 12/01/2010 at 03:36:56 AM
Reply to message
20 Best Science Fiction Books of the Decade - 13/12/2009 10:16:32 PM 1401 Views
How can Harry Potter be there and the Dark Tower not ? - 13/12/2009 11:53:10 PM 805 Views
I guess because... - 14/12/2009 12:11:47 AM 801 Views
Oh. Well that sentence was too long! - 14/12/2009 07:48:19 AM 761 Views
I'm kinda meh on Harry Potter but at least I found it interesting enough to finish - 14/12/2009 02:25:36 PM 764 Views
you're just saying that to hurt me *NM* - 14/12/2009 06:14:31 PM 333 Views
Awww. It isn't just to hurt you. - 14/12/2009 08:55:44 PM 750 Views
I'm really struggling to finish Dark Tower.... - 16/12/2009 07:19:35 AM 715 Views
Similar for me - 16/12/2009 12:03:48 PM 806 Views
It's worth finishing. - 16/12/2009 03:02:32 PM 764 Views
I think they put Oryx and Crake on lists like this just to spite Margaret Atwood *NM* - 14/12/2009 12:10:35 AM 497 Views
What do you mean? *NM* - 14/12/2009 01:52:01 PM 325 Views
She's on record as being a bit snobby about Sci-Fi and not wanting to be labelled with it *NM* - 14/12/2009 02:23:46 PM 313 Views
Yes, and the book is bad. - 14/12/2009 06:18:02 PM 804 Views
I liked it - 16/12/2009 01:17:57 PM 799 Views
I agree with her 100%. It's not Science Fiction. *NM* - 15/12/2009 06:47:50 PM 352 Views
She later changed her mind and said it is science fiction. - 15/12/2009 10:09:03 PM 953 Views
Lists are created that we may complain about them. - 14/12/2009 12:31:32 AM 764 Views
Yeah, what he said. *NM* - 14/12/2009 07:27:58 AM 318 Views
Read most of these - 14/12/2009 12:43:05 AM 1042 Views
Thank you. - 10/01/2010 01:45:11 AM 1046 Views
Double post - 10/01/2010 01:45:27 AM 994 Views
I'm a little surprised The Lies of Locke Lamora isn't on there, to be honest. - 14/12/2009 02:35:13 AM 736 Views
it's fantasy. not sf even by a stretch. *NM* - 14/12/2009 05:52:05 AM 332 Views
and really, not very good. *NM* - 14/12/2009 05:52:39 AM 347 Views
See below. *NM* - 14/12/2009 06:52:39 AM 336 Views
Harry Potter? *NM* - 14/12/2009 06:52:32 AM 351 Views
Re: 20 Best Science Fiction Books of the Decade - 14/12/2009 02:28:29 PM 749 Views
Not sure if I could come up with a ranking. - 14/12/2009 05:28:34 PM 907 Views
I'd say the Scar is more balanced - 14/12/2009 06:18:13 PM 692 Views
Generally agree but... - 14/12/2009 06:22:50 PM 729 Views
Am I th eonly one who always reads Ekaterina Sedia as Ekaterina Sedai? *NM* - 14/12/2009 08:52:57 PM 370 Views
Nope. *NM* - 14/12/2009 11:41:01 PM 329 Views
Yes. Freak. *NM* - 15/12/2009 11:25:40 AM 314 Views
I thought it was a Wotmania username for a while *NM* - 15/12/2009 06:38:16 PM 311 Views
Same. - 16/12/2009 05:35:55 AM 771 Views
Glad to see Ted Chiang make the list - 10/01/2010 01:48:44 AM 999 Views

Reply to Message