Active Users:468 Time:18/09/2025 03:35:22 PM
Re: I'm going to be very unkind and possibly factually wrong here, since it has been a while. Danae al'Thor Send a noteboard - 14/02/2010 05:52:52 PM
But I am not sure Stephanie Meyer, as a writer, has a purpose for positively-written women or men who do not love.

I don't mean that she sees them only as hangers-on to male protagonists, but I've read these, and I've read her The Host, and all the time it seems to me that - amongst other things that make me wonder if I am a feminazi after all - the greatest passion she is able to characters with (male or female) is love. Romantic love especially.

Bella may have been a good character. but she was never allowed to have her very own plot. If you get what I mean? All of her plot was provided to her by other people, usually male, or male-accessed. These males were usually in love with her. This is a girl who has never really been alone, or sought something entirely for herself as an end that stands independently of other relationships not despite or inspite them but just of itself.

http://coolingpearls.wordpress.com/
http://uncategoricallyroh.wordpress.com/
http://whaq.blogspot.com/
~Roh
This message last edited by Danae al'Thor on 14/02/2010 at 05:53:46 PM
Reply to message
As I don't believe we've actually had a review of this yet... Stephenie Meyer's Twilight series. - 14/02/2010 04:08:51 PM 1513 Views
I think the series is codswallop...and that it DID have potential - 14/02/2010 04:59:56 PM 890 Views
As I said, the second book is better in some regards thanks to that. - 14/02/2010 05:06:29 PM 968 Views
I normally would agree with you - 14/02/2010 06:05:36 PM 820 Views
Re: I normally would agree with you - 15/02/2010 10:10:01 PM 752 Views
Re: Hey, I liked the Backstreet Boys. They sang me into puberty! - 14/02/2010 05:53:36 PM 751 Views
Re: I'm going to be very unkind and possibly factually wrong here, since it has been a while. - 14/02/2010 05:52:52 PM 884 Views
Yeah, absolutely true (spoilers). - 14/02/2010 06:14:58 PM 882 Views
maybe not anti-feminist... - 14/02/2010 06:21:44 PM 977 Views
Re: I think it gets labelled antifeminist because, well, it's Bella, the heroine, and she's so young - 14/02/2010 06:26:37 PM 1051 Views
I love your point about the other "Strong women" - 14/02/2010 06:43:05 PM 862 Views
Re: What is LDS? *NM* - 14/02/2010 06:44:36 PM 341 Views
Probably, but that doesn't make them right. - 14/02/2010 07:11:19 PM 1017 Views
Re: The point I was trying to make there, to some extent... - 14/02/2010 07:20:36 PM 795 Views
precisely - 14/02/2010 06:17:18 PM 806 Views
They lost me with twinkly vampires *NM* - 14/02/2010 09:22:01 PM 456 Views
I think it could have been sold better - 14/02/2010 09:35:07 PM 784 Views
Vampires should be tragic at best monsters at worst - 15/02/2010 04:58:15 PM 824 Views
I thought that was strange too - 15/02/2010 09:19:26 PM 792 Views
I think I would rather just eat people then be stuck in high school forever - 16/02/2010 09:22:07 PM 862 Views
You just had to do it, didn't you? *possible spoiler* - 15/02/2010 01:57:29 AM 1148 Views
yes *spoilers* - 15/02/2010 02:02:27 AM 897 Views
You haven't even read that book! *NM* - 15/02/2010 10:50:49 AM 338 Views
I've read more about it than I've cared to. *NM* - 15/02/2010 09:20:07 PM 323 Views
Yeah. It's one of those things that sound worse out of context than they are in the book itself... - 15/02/2010 10:57:47 AM 862 Views
Re: Monster Demon Baby! - 15/02/2010 12:56:39 PM 850 Views
Wow, dude. Just. Wow. *NM* - 16/02/2010 02:29:31 AM 328 Views
Great way to label this series... - 26/02/2010 07:40:47 PM 941 Views
I read a lot of PNR (paranormal romance for you book snobs out there) and thus have read these too. - 15/02/2010 09:55:54 PM 850 Views
I totally agree about book four. - 15/02/2010 10:02:43 PM 780 Views
Mormon fantasy...haha - 15/02/2010 10:06:58 PM 1257 Views
*lmao* There are gay men who like Edward? - 15/02/2010 10:12:37 PM 971 Views
Re: *lmao* There are gay men who like Edward? - 15/02/2010 10:16:32 PM 850 Views

Reply to Message