From Martin's latest not-blog entry:
"Just musing aloud here, so don't anyone get all hysterical... but depending on how long the book comes out, moving some of these finished chapters into WINDS OF WINTER may make sense. Structurally you could make a good case for making DANCE a perfect parallel to FEAST; different cast of characters, but exactly the same time frame, so both books end on the same approximate date. Then WINDS could pick up the action for both sets of characters the following day.
That's not the way I have been doing it, however. As written, I've covered the FEAST time frame in the first 800 pages (manuscript pages, the printed book pages will be different) of DANCE. Everything that follows is post-FEAST, so that's where some of the cast from the last book start popping up again. Not the most elegant structure, I admit... but given how late this one is, I wanted to resolve at least a few of the cliffhangers from FEAST... (if only to set up the new cliffhangers). So..."
For what little it's worth, I thought I should go on record to say that the idea of splitting based on chronology would be a huge mistake. To say nothing of the fact that circa 800 manuscript pages would produce a frustratingly short volume after a five-year wait, and presumably the shortest one in the series to date, leaving Dany's plotline before her potential suitors arrive would mean that we can probably expect minimal plot progress in her arc, which would put off a lot of readers. I think Martin's best course might be to compromise and cut selectively from the Feast cast, leaving Dany's suitors in Dance but leaving Cersei, Brienne, and some of the others for Winds.
Any thoughts?
"Just musing aloud here, so don't anyone get all hysterical... but depending on how long the book comes out, moving some of these finished chapters into WINDS OF WINTER may make sense. Structurally you could make a good case for making DANCE a perfect parallel to FEAST; different cast of characters, but exactly the same time frame, so both books end on the same approximate date. Then WINDS could pick up the action for both sets of characters the following day.
That's not the way I have been doing it, however. As written, I've covered the FEAST time frame in the first 800 pages (manuscript pages, the printed book pages will be different) of DANCE. Everything that follows is post-FEAST, so that's where some of the cast from the last book start popping up again. Not the most elegant structure, I admit... but given how late this one is, I wanted to resolve at least a few of the cliffhangers from FEAST... (if only to set up the new cliffhangers). So..."
For what little it's worth, I thought I should go on record to say that the idea of splitting based on chronology would be a huge mistake. To say nothing of the fact that circa 800 manuscript pages would produce a frustratingly short volume after a five-year wait, and presumably the shortest one in the series to date, leaving Dany's plotline before her potential suitors arrive would mean that we can probably expect minimal plot progress in her arc, which would put off a lot of readers. I think Martin's best course might be to compromise and cut selectively from the Feast cast, leaving Dany's suitors in Dance but leaving Cersei, Brienne, and some of the others for Winds.
Any thoughts?
This message last edited by RandAllThor on 16/02/2010 at 12:34:12 PM
Still more SoIaF news
05/02/2010 02:45:59 PM
- 965 Views
Maybe he should split it in half. Make it a kind of split-by-characters.
05/02/2010 02:51:47 PM
- 550 Views
Not trying to be snarky here, but isn't his blog publicly available?
05/02/2010 04:12:47 PM
- 567 Views
Re: Not trying to be snarky here, but isn't his blog publicly available?
05/02/2010 04:51:50 PM
- 506 Views
I guess. It just sort of reminds me of the people who would post Onion stories back at wotmania.
05/02/2010 05:17:09 PM
- 471 Views
Perhaps someone could create a single sticky thread for all pre-Dance completion news. *NM*
05/02/2010 07:03:16 PM
- 166 Views
I didn't think it was generally known that he had pushed back an Arya chapter. I didn't know anyway.
05/02/2010 07:01:08 PM
- 423 Views
It is older news.
06/02/2010 04:20:43 PM
- 565 Views
Re: It is older news.
06/02/2010 09:08:21 PM
- 416 Views
Nothing is off the table at this point + there's a new update.
09/02/2010 01:56:36 PM
- 426 Views
Yep.
09/02/2010 02:11:58 PM
- 356 Views
Reminiscent of the situation at the end of the writing process on AFFC.
09/02/2010 05:38:08 PM
- 458 Views
On splitting ADWD
16/02/2010 12:32:51 PM
- 486 Views
Re: On splitting ADWD
16/02/2010 03:54:51 PM
- 528 Views
Agreed, I could go for a split in publication as long as the two parts came out a few months apart.
16/02/2010 04:20:06 PM
- 443 Views