Okay, I'm going to ramble (I almost always do) so just hang in there and I'll probably get around to what I want to say.

I find the ebook thing very....interesting. I will be the first to admit, in my lust to get books, I have in the past *cough* obtained *cough* them from certain websites as .pdf or .html files and read them on my computer. I will not spend my time trying to defend myself, but I'll just say that I'm done downloading books. Authors need to be compensated, or I need to get my butt to the library.

That said, the experience I had reading books off the computer screen was....not really that bad at all. I actually liked it. So, I'm assuming I'll be the perfect candidate for something like a Kindle. Mind you, I won't be buying a kindle or anything else until we settle on a format that can be read by ALL ebook readers. Proprietary=no no.

So, all that said, I wonder how authors feel about the kindle, and about ebooks in general.

On the one hand, it might be argued that they won't make as much because they're not selling hardbacks at $25 a piece.

On the other hand, it might also be argued that if they really have a great piece of fiction they could stand to make even more because the entry price is lower. The Kindle sells books at $10 a piece, even brand new, and this appeals to be as a consumer.

On a third, and strangely smelly hand, I'd say that's only true for consumers that have a fair chunk of cash in the first place, because those Kindles don't grow on trees.

On a fourth, quiet and misunderstood hand that lives in its parent hands' basement, the electronic format could potentially be seen as somewhat of a revolution for the small-timers out there that want to get a book published. They've got something really great, and maybe they won't even have to have a publisher in the near future?

However, having people publish whatever they want could possibly just spell doom for the universe.

Your thoughts?