Re: I love the title. May have to read it based on that alone.
wahooka Send a noteboard - 11/03/2010 07:43:03 PM
It is a dystopian science fiction novel, or you can possibly say alternative history, since the only sci-fi element of the book is the discovery of a new, intelligent race of water inhabiting creatures that are for their similarities classified as a new breed of newts.
The book was written in 1930's and the story (even though it isn't specified) starts in 30's as well, and then spans several decades (again not specified). It is divided into three books that deal with the discovery and the evolution of newts, and finally with their conflict with humans.
Although the title of the book is War with the Newts only the last couple of chapters actually deal with this war. It focuses more on their evolution instead. This evolution is artificially accelerated by human influence, they (/we) find this new intelligent race useful and exploit them as cheap workforce.
In this book, ?apek explores, usually with satirical point of view, themes like slavery, piracy, racism, colonialism, arms race, and many others. ?apek was one of the most notable pre-war Czech critics of Nazism, and it can also be seen in this book, when, for example, a German scientist makes a discovery that German Newts are a special Nordic kind of Newts and superior to others, even though all Newts are the same. However, what I found the most interesting in this book were the similarities between the interwar society and our modern society. Sure, there are differences, but at times, it was almost chilling how similar they are, especially in relation with themes.
Another interesting thing about this book is its style, because it changes. Most of the time, ?apek uses normal literal narrative style, but at times it changes into journalist, or historian styles. The whole second book, for example, is written like a thesis, along with footnotes and citations of fictional newspaper articles and other fictional documents. And the story doesn’t suffer from it, on the contrary, it makes it more intriguing.
It has been more than 70 years since ?apek’s death, so his works can now be downloaded for free (at least in the Czech Republic). However, I would suggest reading a "normal, printed" book because of all those citations and footnotes. In my copy of the book, they are printed in form of old newspaper clippings of various fonts and styles, and it’s really quite nicely done. I don’t know if it would be done similarly in an e-book copy, and I think that the book would lose something without it.
The book was written in 1930's and the story (even though it isn't specified) starts in 30's as well, and then spans several decades (again not specified). It is divided into three books that deal with the discovery and the evolution of newts, and finally with their conflict with humans.
Although the title of the book is War with the Newts only the last couple of chapters actually deal with this war. It focuses more on their evolution instead. This evolution is artificially accelerated by human influence, they (/we) find this new intelligent race useful and exploit them as cheap workforce.
In this book, ?apek explores, usually with satirical point of view, themes like slavery, piracy, racism, colonialism, arms race, and many others. ?apek was one of the most notable pre-war Czech critics of Nazism, and it can also be seen in this book, when, for example, a German scientist makes a discovery that German Newts are a special Nordic kind of Newts and superior to others, even though all Newts are the same. However, what I found the most interesting in this book were the similarities between the interwar society and our modern society. Sure, there are differences, but at times, it was almost chilling how similar they are, especially in relation with themes.
Another interesting thing about this book is its style, because it changes. Most of the time, ?apek uses normal literal narrative style, but at times it changes into journalist, or historian styles. The whole second book, for example, is written like a thesis, along with footnotes and citations of fictional newspaper articles and other fictional documents. And the story doesn’t suffer from it, on the contrary, it makes it more intriguing.
It has been more than 70 years since ?apek’s death, so his works can now be downloaded for free (at least in the Czech Republic). However, I would suggest reading a "normal, printed" book because of all those citations and footnotes. In my copy of the book, they are printed in form of old newspaper clippings of various fonts and styles, and it’s really quite nicely done. I don’t know if it would be done similarly in an e-book copy, and I think that the book would lose something without it.
What's the best book you've read so far this year?
22/02/2010 04:34:39 PM
- 1618 Views
Re: While it was not the most clever or innovative or what-have-you
22/02/2010 04:44:30 PM
- 1213 Views
Best Served Cold
22/02/2010 05:57:27 PM
- 1048 Views
I will pick up Abercrombie at some point. Ben has them. <3 Ben's bookshelves. *NM*
10/03/2010 09:21:24 PM
- 565 Views
The Road by Cormac McCarthy.... In fact, it is one of the best I've read ever! *NM*
22/02/2010 09:03:18 PM
- 740 Views
In the Valley of the Kings by Terrence Holt.
22/02/2010 10:23:04 PM
- 1145 Views
After googling that...
10/03/2010 09:23:37 PM
- 922 Views
It truly is great. Larry reviewed it here sometime in September or October. *NM*
19/03/2010 12:00:21 AM
- 556 Views
A Game of Thrones
22/02/2010 10:34:56 PM
- 1018 Views
Re: I'm going to be that bitch
22/02/2010 10:44:03 PM
- 1033 Views
I don't know whether to agree or disagree with this.
23/02/2010 03:17:02 PM
- 1215 Views

Re: I don't know whether to agree or disagree with this.
23/02/2010 03:38:13 PM
- 1124 Views

Andromaque by Jean Racine.
22/02/2010 10:39:12 PM
- 918 Views
En français?
10/03/2010 09:25:23 PM
- 974 Views
Oui. Renaissance French isn't that different from modern French.
11/03/2010 01:04:09 AM
- 1204 Views
While Cloud Atlas was indeed a very fine book that I read this year...
22/02/2010 10:58:45 PM
- 1057 Views
Elizabeth Bear's By the Mountain Bound was sick good. *NM*
22/02/2010 11:37:47 PM
- 460 Views
Either a Storm of Swords or Gardens of the Moon *NM*
22/02/2010 11:55:17 PM
- 650 Views
Both "Grass" by Sheri Tepper & "Pandora's Star" by Peter Hamilton *NM*
23/02/2010 05:15:06 AM
- 744 Views
If you had to recommend one of those to someone, which would you choose and why? *NM*
10/03/2010 09:29:23 PM
- 593 Views
Catch-22 by Joseph Heller
23/02/2010 08:36:27 AM
- 1000 Views
Fateless by Imre Kertesz
23/02/2010 10:04:55 AM
- 890 Views
I think I like most things you read, so that's going on my list too. *NM*
10/03/2010 09:30:11 PM
- 606 Views
The Archer's Tale by Bernard Cornwell *NM*
24/02/2010 03:04:56 PM
- 689 Views
I've picked up Cornwell many times and then put them down again.
10/03/2010 09:31:58 PM
- 1018 Views
Re: I've picked up Cornwell many times and then put them down again.
19/03/2010 12:08:36 AM
- 1249 Views
War with the Newts by Karel Čapek *NM*
27/02/2010 10:06:10 AM
- 401 Views
I love the title. May have to read it based on that alone. *NM*
10/03/2010 09:32:23 PM
- 557 Views
Re: I love the title. May have to read it based on that alone.
11/03/2010 07:43:03 PM
- 1089 Views