Active Users:1178 Time:14/08/2026 07:52:38 AM
I enjoyed reading the Bayard. Cockatiel of Doom Send a noteboard - 12/03/2010 11:55:09 PM

Have you read Sherlock Holmes Was Wrong by Pierre Bayard? He grounds it in some dubious psychology, but the main part of it, where he picks apart The Hound of the Baskervilles is very good.


Had to re-read Hound of the Baskervilles along with it... along with the Agatha Christie he includes. Can't remember which one that is now.

I do remember being upset that I hadn't read one of the books he dissects, so then I knew the answer, as it were. The right and the wrong one.
Taking a break from being Ella

Reply to message
Unreliable narrators: yay or nay? Or neigh? And if so, and you are a horse, how are you typing? - 12/03/2010 05:20:09 AM 1051 Views
Re: Unreliable narrators: yay or nay? Or neigh? And if so, and you are a horse, how are you typing? - 12/03/2010 09:12:23 AM 844 Views
I enjoyed reading the Bayard. - 12/03/2010 11:55:09 PM 772 Views
Re: I enjoyed reading the Bayard. - 14/03/2010 10:56:54 AM 828 Views
Re: I enjoyed reading the Bayard. - 16/03/2010 10:37:35 PM 814 Views
Re: I enjoyed reading the Bayard. - 16/03/2010 10:39:13 PM 779 Views
Yes. - 17/03/2010 05:01:31 PM 826 Views
Re: Yes. - 17/03/2010 07:53:38 PM 726 Views
I don't mind either way. - 12/03/2010 10:18:03 AM 827 Views
Your face is an unreliable horse! - 12/03/2010 10:25:32 AM 850 Views
I think it's fairly logical that genre fiction doesn't employ it as often. - 12/03/2010 01:21:06 PM 1008 Views
Well, isn't Erikson notable for his unreliable POVs? - 14/03/2010 12:57:25 AM 807 Views
Hm. Yeigh? - 12/03/2010 05:15:41 PM 897 Views
I like it when they are well written - 15/03/2010 08:44:02 AM 1146 Views
Like anything else it is good when done right - 15/03/2010 10:32:48 PM 924 Views
I think because of our cynical nature - 19/03/2010 06:58:05 AM 801 Views

Reply to Message