Active Users:191 Time:18/05/2024 10:32:54 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: Yes. Camilla Send a noteboard - 17/03/2010 07:53:38 PM

The Ackroyd book, wasn't it?


It was.

I haven't read Bayard's take on that.


He does a similar thing. Murderer as named in the story is not actual murderer, etc. I thought it was fun, even if it was hard to take seriously.


He loses me when he start talking about independent action from characters and deep animosity on the part of the author, but his theory otherwise is sound.


I had trouble with the whole "author does not know what his characters are really doing" type of thing. Bit odd. But interesting all the same.


Well, it makes sense if you see it in the context of reader reception theory like Iser, ie that there are gaps in every text which the reader has to fill in, and the author cannot control that. But not in the "they are actual people with intentions and plans" kind of way, which I felt is how he portrayed it.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
Reply to message
Unreliable narrators: yay or nay? Or neigh? And if so, and you are a horse, how are you typing? Ghavrel - 12/03/2010 05:20:09 AM 724 Views
Re: Unreliable narrators: yay or nay? Or neigh? And if so, and you are a horse, how are you typing? Camilla - 12/03/2010 09:12:23 AM 545 Views
I enjoyed reading the Bayard. Cockatiel of Doom - 12/03/2010 11:55:09 PM 480 Views
Re: I enjoyed reading the Bayard. Camilla - 14/03/2010 10:56:54 AM 548 Views
Re: I enjoyed reading the Bayard. Cockatiel of Doom - 16/03/2010 10:37:35 PM 519 Views
Re: I enjoyed reading the Bayard. Camilla - 16/03/2010 10:39:13 PM 506 Views
Yes. Cockatiel of Doom - 17/03/2010 05:01:31 PM 540 Views
Re: Yes. Camilla - 17/03/2010 07:53:38 PM 429 Views
I don't mind either way. jh - 12/03/2010 10:18:03 AM 530 Views
Your face is an unreliable horse! snoopcester - 12/03/2010 10:25:32 AM 539 Views
I think it's fairly logical that genre fiction doesn't employ it as often. Legolas - 12/03/2010 01:21:06 PM 701 Views
Well, isn't Erikson notable for his unreliable POVs? Ghavrel - 14/03/2010 12:57:25 AM 534 Views
Hm. Yeigh? Rebekah - 12/03/2010 05:15:41 PM 596 Views
I think that unreliable narrators tend to be written by more experienced or skillful authors. lord-of-shadow - 12/03/2010 06:56:06 PM 485 Views
I like it when they are well written rAndy aL - 15/03/2010 08:44:02 AM 732 Views
Like anything else it is good when done right random thoughts - 15/03/2010 10:32:48 PM 610 Views
I think because of our cynical nature Ryan - 19/03/2010 06:58:05 AM 508 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes