Re: I was gonna make a post with precisely the same title as Camilla's. So: Oh, come on.
Legolas Send a noteboard - 13/05/2010 11:16:07 PM
If I said she was acting like that, sure. But I said "it can come across." All I meant was that posting more than one thread on the same topic in very rapid succession can annoy some people, in much the same way that Dragonsoul and traska's one-track style of posting annoys people. I think that was pretty clear from my post, but maybe it was worded ambiguously.
Two threads, with two days between them, and the later post was linking to an amusing article. Sure, Werthead posted another thread about the same thing at almost the same time two days ago, and there have been threads from others too, but that's hardly her fault.
Less ambiguously, then, I think the phrase "keep it in one thread" applies here. And yes, that should apply to US politics too, but as I very rarely create threads on US politics I don't exactly know why you're taking me to task on it.
"Keep it in one thread" is one thing, but that wasn't what Greg was complaining about, it wasn't what people were ganging up on her about, and it wasn't what your previous two posts were about.
And as for why I take you to task and not someone else: the usual reason, yours was the one reply too many that made it look like everybody ganging up on her for no good reason that I can see.
How to live with the Tories
13/05/2010 12:33:49 PM
- 1079 Views
Her 101 reasons to love our Tory government was even better.
13/05/2010 12:42:39 PM
- 739 Views
What an even-handed, stereotype-free, and balanced piece of journalism. *NM*
13/05/2010 02:07:35 PM
- 339 Views
Your partisanship is getting annoying, actually.
13/05/2010 06:55:28 PM
- 804 Views
I'm sorry I care about politics.
13/05/2010 08:45:26 PM
- 747 Views
It's easy to complain. Actually doing something is rather more difficult. *NM*
13/05/2010 10:17:47 PM
- 308 Views
What do you suggest I do, pray tell? *NM*
13/05/2010 10:19:30 PM
- 290 Views
Learn how to live with people who disagree with you.
13/05/2010 10:21:08 PM
- 645 Views
Oh, come on.
13/05/2010 10:29:38 PM
- 765 Views
Do you really spell it "superiour" in Britain? That's wonderful.
13/05/2010 10:37:21 PM
- 796 Views
Pretty please with sugar on top
13/05/2010 10:50:48 PM
- 725 Views
Meh. That wasn't meant to be condescending. I never expected the ou to enter that word, is all.
13/05/2010 11:02:11 PM
- 703 Views
Re: Meh. That wasn't meant to be condescending. I never expected the ou to enter that word, is all.
13/05/2010 11:03:42 PM
- 657 Views
Yeah, um, that wasn't me.
13/05/2010 11:08:48 PM
- 681 Views
Re: Yeah, um, that wasn't me.
13/05/2010 11:11:04 PM
- 679 Views
I don't mind transference of anger, but let's keep my quotes accurate at least.
13/05/2010 11:15:37 PM
- 687 Views

See, this is what I find offensive
13/05/2010 11:21:28 PM
- 685 Views
Fair enough. It was unfair of me to use "learn."
13/05/2010 11:30:34 PM
- 661 Views
Two posts in three days about a new Government in the country?
13/05/2010 11:18:06 PM
- 694 Views
This is so true
13/05/2010 11:29:30 PM
- 655 Views
Re: This is so true
13/05/2010 11:36:44 PM
- 671 Views
Sorry. But I can't bring myself to vote for 'that bloody party'
13/05/2010 11:48:26 PM
- 660 Views
Re: Sorry. But I can't bring myself to vote for 'that bloody party'
13/05/2010 11:54:10 PM
- 649 Views
I certainly wouldn't go that far. Nowhere near. *NM*
13/05/2010 11:43:20 PM
- 334 Views
On the comparison or on you people's spelling?
*NM*
14/05/2010 12:13:42 AM
- 307 Views

They were not delivered condescendingly. I am sorry you took it as such.
13/05/2010 11:50:23 PM
- 639 Views
Re: They were not delivered condescendingly. I am sorry you took it as such.
13/05/2010 11:53:08 PM
- 680 Views
Eh, another time then.
13/05/2010 11:56:21 PM
- 711 Views
I was gonna make a post with precisely the same title as Camilla's. So: Oh, come on.
13/05/2010 10:43:12 PM
- 780 Views
Re: I was gonna make a post with precisely the same title as Camilla's. So: Oh, come on.
13/05/2010 10:59:28 PM
- 685 Views
Re: I was gonna make a post with precisely the same title as Camilla's. So: Oh, come on.
13/05/2010 11:16:07 PM
- 802 Views
I dunno. It looks to me that's what Balwer was saying with his flogged horse comment.
13/05/2010 11:18:30 PM
- 611 Views
I'm sorry you care more about your own political agenda than about trying to see a party in power
13/05/2010 11:44:32 PM
- 611 Views
You think Tories won't go proto-Orwellian on you?
13/05/2010 11:46:45 PM
- 596 Views
If both, theoretically, will abuse power, then
13/05/2010 11:54:53 PM
- 697 Views
Re: If both, theoretically, will abuse power, then
13/05/2010 11:58:17 PM
- 688 Views
Thing is,
13/05/2010 11:55:17 PM
- 678 Views
Re: Thing is,
13/05/2010 11:59:58 PM
- 778 Views
A date "in a year's time" will be easy to remember. We have Scottish elections on 5 May 2011.
14/05/2010 12:12:26 PM
- 592 Views
People are saying it because those with a good knowledge of the party are telling them that.
14/05/2010 11:40:25 AM
- 746 Views
Re: People are saying it because those with a good knowledge of the party are telling them that.
14/05/2010 01:05:44 PM
- 679 Views
Re: People are saying it because those with a good knowledge of the party are telling them that.
14/05/2010 01:28:38 PM
- 794 Views