Re: If not a fan of Labour and not a fan of Tory, then
Camilla Send a noteboard - 14/05/2010 12:06:56 AM
they might not, tempered by Lib-Dems, but Tories have no clean reputation when it comes to abuse of state power.
let's give a chance to those who haven't for the past decade. Seriously, you don't know how upsetting it is to see what Labour has been doing in the UK in regards to curtailing civil rights in the name of safety. Not to mention blindly following into Iraq without question. That was a horrid moment and not one that should ever have happened under Labour. I can understand under John Howard(Aus), but not Blair.
Why do you think I do not know how upsetting it is to see what Labour has been doing? I am no fan of Labour. Anything but. You should know this. Really.
whatever form of new Tory the Lib Dems cause them to become should be an interesting political experiment.
Hey, I prefer combination of Green and Liberal Democract as the poll said.
The Tories, in all probability, will not stand by whatever they have promised the LibDems. They have bought their soul (PR) with trinkets that they will not have to fulfil. If I am wrong, that will make me happy. But I do not think I am.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
How to live with the Tories
13/05/2010 12:33:49 PM
- 1079 Views
Her 101 reasons to love our Tory government was even better.
13/05/2010 12:42:39 PM
- 739 Views
What an even-handed, stereotype-free, and balanced piece of journalism. *NM*
13/05/2010 02:07:35 PM
- 339 Views
Your partisanship is getting annoying, actually.
13/05/2010 06:55:28 PM
- 805 Views
I'm sorry I care about politics.
13/05/2010 08:45:26 PM
- 747 Views
It's easy to complain. Actually doing something is rather more difficult. *NM*
13/05/2010 10:17:47 PM
- 308 Views
What do you suggest I do, pray tell? *NM*
13/05/2010 10:19:30 PM
- 290 Views
Learn how to live with people who disagree with you.
13/05/2010 10:21:08 PM
- 648 Views
Oh, come on.
13/05/2010 10:29:38 PM
- 765 Views
Do you really spell it "superiour" in Britain? That's wonderful.
13/05/2010 10:37:21 PM
- 796 Views
Pretty please with sugar on top
13/05/2010 10:50:48 PM
- 725 Views
Meh. That wasn't meant to be condescending. I never expected the ou to enter that word, is all.
13/05/2010 11:02:11 PM
- 704 Views
Re: Meh. That wasn't meant to be condescending. I never expected the ou to enter that word, is all.
13/05/2010 11:03:42 PM
- 658 Views
Yeah, um, that wasn't me.
13/05/2010 11:08:48 PM
- 682 Views
Re: Yeah, um, that wasn't me.
13/05/2010 11:11:04 PM
- 679 Views
I don't mind transference of anger, but let's keep my quotes accurate at least.
13/05/2010 11:15:37 PM
- 689 Views

See, this is what I find offensive
13/05/2010 11:21:28 PM
- 685 Views
Fair enough. It was unfair of me to use "learn."
13/05/2010 11:30:34 PM
- 661 Views
Two posts in three days about a new Government in the country?
13/05/2010 11:18:06 PM
- 694 Views
This is so true
13/05/2010 11:29:30 PM
- 655 Views
Re: This is so true
13/05/2010 11:36:44 PM
- 671 Views
Sorry. But I can't bring myself to vote for 'that bloody party'
13/05/2010 11:48:26 PM
- 660 Views
Re: Sorry. But I can't bring myself to vote for 'that bloody party'
13/05/2010 11:54:10 PM
- 649 Views
I certainly wouldn't go that far. Nowhere near. *NM*
13/05/2010 11:43:20 PM
- 334 Views
On the comparison or on you people's spelling?
*NM*
14/05/2010 12:13:42 AM
- 307 Views

They were not delivered condescendingly. I am sorry you took it as such.
13/05/2010 11:50:23 PM
- 641 Views
Re: They were not delivered condescendingly. I am sorry you took it as such.
13/05/2010 11:53:08 PM
- 680 Views
Eh, another time then.
13/05/2010 11:56:21 PM
- 711 Views
I was gonna make a post with precisely the same title as Camilla's. So: Oh, come on.
13/05/2010 10:43:12 PM
- 780 Views
Re: I was gonna make a post with precisely the same title as Camilla's. So: Oh, come on.
13/05/2010 10:59:28 PM
- 686 Views
Re: I was gonna make a post with precisely the same title as Camilla's. So: Oh, come on.
13/05/2010 11:16:07 PM
- 803 Views
I dunno. It looks to me that's what Balwer was saying with his flogged horse comment.
13/05/2010 11:18:30 PM
- 611 Views
I'm sorry you care more about your own political agenda than about trying to see a party in power
13/05/2010 11:44:32 PM
- 611 Views
You think Tories won't go proto-Orwellian on you?
13/05/2010 11:46:45 PM
- 596 Views
If both, theoretically, will abuse power, then
13/05/2010 11:54:53 PM
- 697 Views
Re: If both, theoretically, will abuse power, then
13/05/2010 11:58:17 PM
- 688 Views
If not a fan of Labour and not a fan of Tory, then
14/05/2010 12:01:37 AM
- 716 Views
Re: If not a fan of Labour and not a fan of Tory, then
14/05/2010 12:06:56 AM
- 712 Views
Thing is,
13/05/2010 11:55:17 PM
- 678 Views
Re: Thing is,
13/05/2010 11:59:58 PM
- 778 Views
A date "in a year's time" will be easy to remember. We have Scottish elections on 5 May 2011.
14/05/2010 12:12:26 PM
- 594 Views
People are saying it because those with a good knowledge of the party are telling them that.
14/05/2010 11:40:25 AM
- 747 Views
Re: People are saying it because those with a good knowledge of the party are telling them that.
14/05/2010 01:05:44 PM
- 679 Views
Re: People are saying it because those with a good knowledge of the party are telling them that.
14/05/2010 01:28:38 PM
- 795 Views