Re: People are saying it because those with a good knowledge of the party are telling them that.
snoopcester Send a noteboard - 14/05/2010 01:28:38 PM
I find the Spectator is quite a worrying magazine and take everything it has to say about everyone with a large bag of salt.
While I find it worrying as well, that is more my view on the political right showing though... it has good ties with members of the Conservative party and is fairly reliable for reflecting that.
That's a little scary, yes. Some former Lib Dem chappy says everyone's over-reacting about that, but I guess he has to say that.
Yeah, I am currently leaning more to it being a screw up where the intent was purely to secure the coalition in place through till the end of the term but no one stopped to consider what the actual implication of what they were doing was.
It does seem to be a unifying issue, from the coverage today pretty much everyone is against it who hasn't bought into the coalition be they on the right or the left.
*MySmiley*
Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."
Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."
Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
How to live with the Tories
13/05/2010 12:33:49 PM
- 1054 Views
Her 101 reasons to love our Tory government was even better.
13/05/2010 12:42:39 PM
- 715 Views
What an even-handed, stereotype-free, and balanced piece of journalism. *NM*
13/05/2010 02:07:35 PM
- 331 Views
Your partisanship is getting annoying, actually.
13/05/2010 06:55:28 PM
- 790 Views
I'm sorry I care about politics.
13/05/2010 08:45:26 PM
- 729 Views
It's easy to complain. Actually doing something is rather more difficult. *NM*
13/05/2010 10:17:47 PM
- 301 Views
What do you suggest I do, pray tell? *NM*
13/05/2010 10:19:30 PM
- 283 Views
Learn how to live with people who disagree with you.
13/05/2010 10:21:08 PM
- 633 Views
Oh, come on.
13/05/2010 10:29:38 PM
- 749 Views
Do you really spell it "superiour" in Britain? That's wonderful.
13/05/2010 10:37:21 PM
- 781 Views
Pretty please with sugar on top
13/05/2010 10:50:48 PM
- 707 Views
Meh. That wasn't meant to be condescending. I never expected the ou to enter that word, is all.
13/05/2010 11:02:11 PM
- 675 Views
Re: Meh. That wasn't meant to be condescending. I never expected the ou to enter that word, is all.
13/05/2010 11:03:42 PM
- 640 Views
Yeah, um, that wasn't me.
13/05/2010 11:08:48 PM
- 667 Views
Re: Yeah, um, that wasn't me.
13/05/2010 11:11:04 PM
- 662 Views
I don't mind transference of anger, but let's keep my quotes accurate at least.
13/05/2010 11:15:37 PM
- 672 Views

See, this is what I find offensive
13/05/2010 11:21:28 PM
- 669 Views
Fair enough. It was unfair of me to use "learn."
13/05/2010 11:30:34 PM
- 646 Views
Two posts in three days about a new Government in the country?
13/05/2010 11:18:06 PM
- 679 Views
This is so true
13/05/2010 11:29:30 PM
- 640 Views
Re: This is so true
13/05/2010 11:36:44 PM
- 655 Views
Sorry. But I can't bring myself to vote for 'that bloody party'
13/05/2010 11:48:26 PM
- 643 Views
Re: Sorry. But I can't bring myself to vote for 'that bloody party'
13/05/2010 11:54:10 PM
- 633 Views
I certainly wouldn't go that far. Nowhere near. *NM*
13/05/2010 11:43:20 PM
- 325 Views
On the comparison or on you people's spelling?
*NM*
14/05/2010 12:13:42 AM
- 300 Views

They were not delivered condescendingly. I am sorry you took it as such.
13/05/2010 11:50:23 PM
- 625 Views
Re: They were not delivered condescendingly. I am sorry you took it as such.
13/05/2010 11:53:08 PM
- 664 Views
Eh, another time then.
13/05/2010 11:56:21 PM
- 695 Views
I was gonna make a post with precisely the same title as Camilla's. So: Oh, come on.
13/05/2010 10:43:12 PM
- 764 Views
Re: I was gonna make a post with precisely the same title as Camilla's. So: Oh, come on.
13/05/2010 10:59:28 PM
- 671 Views
Re: I was gonna make a post with precisely the same title as Camilla's. So: Oh, come on.
13/05/2010 11:16:07 PM
- 785 Views
I dunno. It looks to me that's what Balwer was saying with his flogged horse comment.
13/05/2010 11:18:30 PM
- 592 Views
I'm sorry you care more about your own political agenda than about trying to see a party in power
13/05/2010 11:44:32 PM
- 594 Views
You think Tories won't go proto-Orwellian on you?
13/05/2010 11:46:45 PM
- 581 Views
If both, theoretically, will abuse power, then
13/05/2010 11:54:53 PM
- 676 Views
Re: If both, theoretically, will abuse power, then
13/05/2010 11:58:17 PM
- 671 Views
Thing is,
13/05/2010 11:55:17 PM
- 663 Views
Re: Thing is,
13/05/2010 11:59:58 PM
- 761 Views
A date "in a year's time" will be easy to remember. We have Scottish elections on 5 May 2011.
14/05/2010 12:12:26 PM
- 579 Views
People are saying it because those with a good knowledge of the party are telling them that.
14/05/2010 11:40:25 AM
- 732 Views
Re: People are saying it because those with a good knowledge of the party are telling them that.
14/05/2010 01:05:44 PM
- 664 Views