Well, I'm not vouching for Wikipedias claim, just reiterating it.
Joel Send a noteboard - 25/05/2010 02:35:23 PM
In fact, my HS Honors Algebra teacher suggested it. He also baptized me, but that was about ten years later.
Unfortunately I'm a bit put off by the notation and nomenclature, and, though I could be mistaken, it requires at least a little of the calc knowledge I lack. And yet calc strikes me as some of the most interesting math because it's not just manipulating numbers, there's actual THOUGHT involved.

Well, there is a lot of number theory that doesn't involve calculus. Most really, at least of the introductory number theory, you hardly need calc to understand modular arithmetic, people do it regularly when looking at clocks. "Its 10, I'll see you in 4 hours at 2" is basic modular arithmetic, 10 + 4 = 2 (Mod 12)
Yeah, that I can handle. Maybe I should delve a bit more to see what's actually going on but the notation is truly daunting for me. It's a bit like philosophy where you have to take a couple courses to define the terms before you can being the real study.
Speaking of which, I get all you were saying here; I KNOW it's not a mystical magical miracle--but that tells me what it ISN'T, not what it is. Like I said, 2 isn't "spooky" because adding it to itself, or multiplying it, or even raising it to its own power give the same result, it's just that all those things are, in this particular case, the same operation: You're putting two things with two other things, and that means there's four of them, because that's just how counting works. My problem here is I'm UNABLE to explain 7 that way, and it bothers me. And the more I look at it, the freakier it gets, like with the (22/7)^2~10 thing. I mean, seriously, "if leading zeros are not permitted on numerals, then 142857 is the only cyclic number in decimal"?!!! What kind of twisted crap is that? 

Hmm... Cyclic decimals in the reciprocal of a number are neither common nor rare. When you're radix is only ten numbers, 0-9, there's not much of note there, it's like being surprised that out of a sample of ten items of fruit only one was red. There are a lot of red fruits, but a random sample of ten fruits could easily produce one and only one red. In this case 'red' is 'cyclic decimal', that's all.
Well, they're taking the position that 142857 is the only non-trivial case of a decimal without leading zeroes that repeats. Out of an infinite series of integers it seems to be in a class by itself.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Continuing the Math Theme, WTF Is Up with the Seven?
25/05/2010 02:12:09 AM
- 648 Views
25/05/2010 08:19:12 AM
- 480 Views
Number theory holds a concept called "cyclic numbers."
25/05/2010 06:04:43 AM
- 538 Views
"If leading zeros are not permitted on numerals, then 142857 is the only cyclic number in decimal. "
25/05/2010 06:27:36 AM
- 543 Views

Happy Birthday...?
25/05/2010 08:56:59 AM
- 413 Views

You're a day early
25/05/2010 09:10:30 AM
- 428 Views

Got me on a technicality.
25/05/2010 09:19:54 AM
- 329 Views
Re: Got me on a technicality.
25/05/2010 09:27:59 AM
- 368 Views
But we're AWESOME!
25/05/2010 09:47:30 AM
- 469 Views
25/05/2010 09:50:43 AM
- 346 Views

Number THEORY is great fun, but too many folks make math too tedious, I'm afraid.
25/05/2010 09:53:21 AM
- 384 Views

You tend to get cyclic repeats when dividing by primes
25/05/2010 11:58:34 AM
- 563 Views
I actually DO feel like taking a course on number theory.
25/05/2010 12:12:10 PM
- 521 Views
Re: I actually DO feel like taking a course on number theory.
25/05/2010 01:46:10 PM
- 364 Views
Well, I'm not vouching for Wikipedias claim, just reiterating it.
25/05/2010 02:35:23 PM
- 581 Views
It's usually right but I wouldn't but much value on the implied importance
25/05/2010 04:22:52 PM
- 425 Views
If you say so; I really try hard not to channel Pythagoras.
26/05/2010 09:26:22 AM
- 593 Views

Re: If you say so; I really try hard not to channel Pythagoras.
26/05/2010 10:00:37 AM
- 540 Views
