Active Users:781 Time:01/02/2026 08:03:01 PM
These days I typically just say, "Fox. " Joel Send a noteboard - 27/05/2010 03:48:40 PM
Kerry got crap for saying he voted for the bill before he voted against it and for saying if you wanted to know what kind of leader he would be ask the people he served with knowing that many of them opposed him.

I hate to speak out against your faith but it was Fox was hardly alone in not being critical of the war before it began. They did have a number of anchors who supported finishing and who supported the surge when those on the left were saying we should cut and run and screaming that the surge was never work. Funny how much criticism Fox gets for right about and how much chest thumping the left continues to do about being wrong.

Indeed, as I noted above, Kerry got crap for saying he voted for the bill before he voted against it, because he only changed his vote when Republicans started tacking on a whole bunch of pork that didn't help the troops at all. No one wanted to hear it in '04, least of all Faux, so I don't know why they suddenly care now. Apart from partisan bias, of course.


... that people would quit with the mock-names, like "Faux News". It always, 100% of the time, immediately gives me the sense that the writer has no credibility. If you want to make a point, or write persuasively for one side or another of a given debate, please, for the love of god, just call them Fox News. That's their name. And no, as a news writer myself, I don't like how they do things either.

Because I realize the derisive term is inflammatory and thus counterproductive. This time they reminded me why I used to use it exclusively. I will NOT call them "news" because I consider that defamation of journalism. They're an international editorial corporation that occasionally, incidentally, reports some actual news more to salvage some of THEIR credibility than for any other reason. And usually has to spin even that. They're the GOPs answer to Pravda, and while they may give the weather every day, that doesn't make them a "news source. "
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
US Debt Hits $13T - But Spending Spree in DC Continues..... - 26/05/2010 05:09:48 PM 1122 Views
Look who finally remembered they oppose federal deficits. - 26/05/2010 05:26:30 PM 720 Views
Silly Joel.....please find the posts where I supported GWB's deficit spending. - 26/05/2010 05:35:13 PM 774 Views
hmmm - 26/05/2010 05:40:49 PM 713 Views
I thought overthrowing Saddam was fine.....and it worked out very well. - 26/05/2010 06:37:31 PM 688 Views
I'll take what comfort I can from this. - 26/05/2010 06:45:53 PM 771 Views
"They" plural. - 26/05/2010 05:45:48 PM 947 Views
you are so full of crap - 26/05/2010 05:59:47 PM 752 Views
Oh, they weren't silent; they were quite vocal in their endorsement of the Iraq war. - 26/05/2010 06:03:51 PM 980 Views
more ranting doesn't support your argument - 26/05/2010 06:17:22 PM 896 Views
I'll respond to the coherent part of that. - 26/05/2010 06:30:07 PM 916 Views
I wish ... - 26/05/2010 06:57:30 PM 925 Views
Is the NYT any better pieces slandering McCain and his wife before an election? - 26/05/2010 07:16:58 PM 756 Views
I don't know those articles specifically. - 26/05/2010 08:27:44 PM 835 Views
These days I typically just say, "Fox. " - 27/05/2010 03:48:40 PM 920 Views
You mean you will repsond to part that you like and ignore the part you don't because of a typo - 26/05/2010 07:18:03 PM 827 Views
Actually, I think it was a pretty thorough response. - 27/05/2010 03:57:55 PM 920 Views
then let me make is simpler - 27/05/2010 07:23:19 PM 903 Views
I'll give Joel a little hand here... - 26/05/2010 09:14:27 PM 927 Views
commas are so over rated - 26/05/2010 10:50:57 PM 719 Views
I find this image to describe the deficits pretty useful - 27/05/2010 01:56:29 AM 692 Views
Here is the problem with this kind of reporting... - 27/05/2010 07:12:34 AM 823 Views
Correct - 27/05/2010 02:11:47 PM 690 Views
The problem with that kind of logic is it is wrong - 27/05/2010 02:19:37 PM 713 Views
Yes, that would be wrong. - 27/05/2010 03:35:30 PM 742 Views
Based on Obama's budget, he will add more to the debt over the next 10 years..... - 27/05/2010 04:10:45 PM 649 Views
Increasing the debt is a problem, yes. - 27/05/2010 07:55:04 PM 1076 Views
At least we agree that you are wrong because that is what you said - 27/05/2010 06:50:43 PM 686 Views
And where does the rest of the money come from? - 27/05/2010 08:12:31 PM 813 Views
No, that's for the entire Department of Defense. - 27/05/2010 08:25:28 PM 712 Views
using those numbers the war appears to be about half a drop in the bucket *NM* - 27/05/2010 08:37:31 PM 370 Views
I wouldn't call it a drop in the bucket... - 27/05/2010 09:03:43 PM 932 Views
yeah I was just being a smart ass - 27/05/2010 11:09:37 PM 938 Views
Re: And where does the rest of the money come from? - 27/05/2010 10:58:59 PM 836 Views
I interpreted it as saying... - 27/05/2010 02:22:13 PM 1184 Views
Hmmm... - 27/05/2010 03:41:15 PM 756 Views

Reply to Message