You won't hear me complain if the Miranda rights are scaled back a bit.
Legolas Send a noteboard - 02/06/2010 12:40:23 AM
He was told he didn't have to speak and he spoke. It isn't like they grilled him for days he was there for three hours and pretty much admitted that he had shot and killed someone. His rights were not violated but letting him walk would have violated the rights of victim and his family.
The Miranda Rights have grown out of control and they need to be trimmed back to some sort of reason. Getting people to admit to crimes they committed is not a bad thing.
The Miranda Rights have grown out of control and they need to be trimmed back to some sort of reason. Getting people to admit to crimes they committed is not a bad thing.
My problem is with scaling them back in such a way that those who are smart or better-informed get a huge advantage. If merely saying "I'm using my Miranda rights" immediately ends the interrogation, as Kennedy suggests, then they should just start the interrogation with "do you exercise your Miranda rights, yes or no?" so that everyone is on the same footing.
SCOTUS Update: Right to remain silent? Suspect better speak up - 
- 01/06/2010 07:53:14 PM
1158 Views
- 01/06/2010 07:53:14 PM
1158 Views
What I don't like about this decision...
- 01/06/2010 08:21:02 PM
740 Views
I think the only potential issue is if the person didn't understand the Miranda warning.
- 01/06/2010 10:37:42 PM
672 Views
*NM*
that is an odd way of looking at it
- 01/06/2010 11:58:12 PM
685 Views
I'm more referring to the almost "magic words" that Kennedy introduces here.
- 02/06/2010 12:18:07 AM
703 Views
So we should not allow police to question people at all?
- 02/06/2010 12:31:27 AM
637 Views
You won't hear me complain if the Miranda rights are scaled back a bit.
- 02/06/2010 12:40:23 AM
628 Views
Forgot to mention - the 5-4 decision was split between cons and libs, but.....
- 01/06/2010 08:36:41 PM
641 Views
This seems reasonable to me.
- 01/06/2010 09:47:34 PM
716 Views
I'm stunned. Your response was reasoned, logical and concise. What have you done with Joel?
- 01/06/2010 10:43:22 PM
676 Views
Joel is going to be so pissed when he finds out that you logged onto his account.....
- 02/06/2010 01:42:50 AM
687 Views
Hey deaf people who can't speak... pound sand.
- 01/06/2010 09:55:41 PM
769 Views
well the deaf can simply close their eyes and end the interview
- 02/06/2010 12:26:31 AM
666 Views
Re: well the deaf can simply close their eyes and end the interview
- 02/06/2010 03:57:35 AM
677 Views
you are often questioned by the police? What are you doing to make that happen?
- 02/06/2010 03:35:47 PM
712 Views
This decision is a setback for us all.
- 01/06/2010 10:10:51 PM
784 Views
No it isn't.
- 01/06/2010 10:42:06 PM
697 Views
Re: No it isn't.
- 01/06/2010 11:26:07 PM
714 Views
Teach people to say "I'm not saying anything until my lawyer gets here." Period. *NM*
- 02/06/2010 12:38:24 AM
281 Views
Close, but not cigar.
- 02/06/2010 01:30:19 AM
718 Views
if they catch more bad guys is that a bad thing? *NM*
- 02/06/2010 01:50:12 AM
297 Views
Would you be okay with the prohibition of firearms if it lowered the crime rate?
- 02/06/2010 02:18:26 AM
680 Views
You are at the intersection of bull and shit.
- 02/06/2010 04:00:32 PM
698 Views
I am confused
- 01/06/2010 11:09:14 PM
684 Views
Re: I am confused
- 01/06/2010 11:15:07 PM
624 Views
ummm, no...
- 02/06/2010 12:13:59 AM
714 Views
Re: ummm, no...
- 02/06/2010 01:38:54 AM
656 Views
Nothing has changed
- 02/06/2010 01:56:08 AM
657 Views
Except you risk waiving them unless you specifically say you want to use them.
- 02/06/2010 04:07:51 AM
671 Views
not surprising that people who use phrases like "Police State of America" believe that
- 02/06/2010 03:24:25 PM
677 Views
As far as I can tell, this changes nothing and simply maintains the status quo.
- 01/06/2010 11:27:36 PM
676 Views
For those who don't understand the techniques of police interrogation let me make this clear.
- 02/06/2010 01:57:51 AM
731 Views
Good advice
- 02/06/2010 04:00:45 AM
615 Views