I think you have to have reasonable balance
random thoughts Send a noteboard - 02/06/2010 05:48:31 PM
I do support reasonable gun safety laws such selling trigger locks with all guns and I believe the person who owns is responsible to make sure the gun is stored safely and should be held responsible when it is not. I own guns and I support gun ownership but I do not support the NRA because their stance is to extreme and they oppose any laws concerning guns.
If we were starting fresh I would be torn between the evils created by civilian gun ownership and personal liberty issue of the right to have the means to defend your family and property. I would probably still come down on the side of gun ownership but I will admit the other side has real and valid concerns.
As for this issue here we need to keep in mind we are talking about real people and not just some political theory. This specific case a man shot and killed someone and the police were able to extract a confession from him without violence and without violating his right to not speak or have an attorney present. If the lower court’s ruling had been upheld a murder would have been released back into the public simply because police had questioned him for three hours even after he didn’t answer right away. I will say again the goal is not to give as many people as possible the chance to get away with murder but to provide everyone reasonable protection from oppressive police tactics.
If we were starting fresh I would be torn between the evils created by civilian gun ownership and personal liberty issue of the right to have the means to defend your family and property. I would probably still come down on the side of gun ownership but I will admit the other side has real and valid concerns.
As for this issue here we need to keep in mind we are talking about real people and not just some political theory. This specific case a man shot and killed someone and the police were able to extract a confession from him without violence and without violating his right to not speak or have an attorney present. If the lower court’s ruling had been upheld a murder would have been released back into the public simply because police had questioned him for three hours even after he didn’t answer right away. I will say again the goal is not to give as many people as possible the chance to get away with murder but to provide everyone reasonable protection from oppressive police tactics.
SCOTUS Update: Right to remain silent? Suspect better speak up -
- 01/06/2010 07:53:14 PM
1286 Views
What I don't like about this decision...
- 01/06/2010 08:21:02 PM
852 Views
I think the only potential issue is if the person didn't understand the Miranda warning.
- 01/06/2010 10:37:42 PM
785 Views
that is an odd way of looking at it
- 01/06/2010 11:58:12 PM
810 Views
I'm more referring to the almost "magic words" that Kennedy introduces here.
- 02/06/2010 12:18:07 AM
818 Views
So we should not allow police to question people at all?
- 02/06/2010 12:31:27 AM
746 Views
You won't hear me complain if the Miranda rights are scaled back a bit.
- 02/06/2010 12:40:23 AM
725 Views
Forgot to mention - the 5-4 decision was split between cons and libs, but.....
- 01/06/2010 08:36:41 PM
756 Views
This seems reasonable to me.
- 01/06/2010 09:47:34 PM
830 Views
I'm stunned. Your response was reasoned, logical and concise. What have you done with Joel?
- 01/06/2010 10:43:22 PM
792 Views
Joel is going to be so pissed when he finds out that you logged onto his account.....
- 02/06/2010 01:42:50 AM
797 Views
Hey deaf people who can't speak... pound sand.
- 01/06/2010 09:55:41 PM
884 Views
well the deaf can simply close their eyes and end the interview
- 02/06/2010 12:26:31 AM
764 Views
Re: well the deaf can simply close their eyes and end the interview
- 02/06/2010 03:57:35 AM
785 Views
you are often questioned by the police? What are you doing to make that happen?
- 02/06/2010 03:35:47 PM
818 Views
This decision is a setback for us all.
- 01/06/2010 10:10:51 PM
900 Views
No it isn't.
- 01/06/2010 10:42:06 PM
810 Views
Re: No it isn't.
- 01/06/2010 11:26:07 PM
823 Views
Teach people to say "I'm not saying anything until my lawyer gets here." Period. *NM*
- 02/06/2010 12:38:24 AM
330 Views
Close, but not cigar.
- 02/06/2010 01:30:19 AM
825 Views
if they catch more bad guys is that a bad thing? *NM*
- 02/06/2010 01:50:12 AM
340 Views
Would you be okay with the prohibition of firearms if it lowered the crime rate?
- 02/06/2010 02:18:26 AM
787 Views
I think you have to have reasonable balance
- 02/06/2010 05:48:31 PM
843 Views
You are at the intersection of bull and shit.
- 02/06/2010 04:00:32 PM
807 Views
I am confused
- 01/06/2010 11:09:14 PM
795 Views
Re: I am confused
- 01/06/2010 11:15:07 PM
730 Views
ummm, no...
- 02/06/2010 12:13:59 AM
824 Views
Re: ummm, no...
- 02/06/2010 01:38:54 AM
769 Views
Nothing has changed
- 02/06/2010 01:56:08 AM
768 Views
Except you risk waiving them unless you specifically say you want to use them.
- 02/06/2010 04:07:51 AM
797 Views
not surprising that people who use phrases like "Police State of America" believe that
- 02/06/2010 03:24:25 PM
790 Views
As far as I can tell, this changes nothing and simply maintains the status quo.
- 01/06/2010 11:27:36 PM
785 Views
For those who don't understand the techniques of police interrogation let me make this clear.
- 02/06/2010 01:57:51 AM
857 Views
Good advice
- 02/06/2010 04:00:45 AM
720 Views

*NM*
