Active Users:885 Time:12/02/2026 06:23:54 PM
LOL LiterateDog Send a noteboard - 02/06/2010 12:52:44 AM
I'm not going to argue language pedantry with Tom. Even if he is technically correct in some proper Latin way, I doubt he applies the same standard to all his English usage of old languages. Otherwise he'd never say things such as stadiums or podiums, for instance.

Anyway, I've said all I'm going to say on the subject. It would be a pointless argument with him. I won't change his mind and he knows for more about languages that I do. He's just not really correct in the modern usage by English-speakers. *shrugs*
"I'll blow whomever I want, whenever I want, as long as I can still breathe and kneel."
-Samantha Jones, SatC
Reply to message
Excruciatingly painful minutia of my life - 02/06/2010 12:00:19 AM 662 Views
It isn't funny without the actual details. - 02/06/2010 12:05:25 AM 422 Views
fair enough - 02/06/2010 12:09:12 AM 484 Views
Oh, c'mon! - 02/06/2010 12:13:22 AM 360 Views
It's "minutiae" - otherwise it's in the singular. *NM* - 02/06/2010 12:36:54 AM 177 Views
Not really. The English usage/spelling of the word is minutia. - 02/06/2010 12:44:06 AM 369 Views
~pulls up a lawn chair with cold drinks and popcorn and settles in~ *NM* - 02/06/2010 12:47:15 AM 178 Views
LOL - 02/06/2010 12:52:44 AM 368 Views
oh, pooh - 02/06/2010 12:55:13 AM 362 Views
I'd say "stadia" and "podia" if for some reason I were inclined to make those words plural. - 02/06/2010 05:00:53 AM 392 Views
I didn't say that they were the same usage rules. - 02/06/2010 06:18:53 AM 394 Views
Don't people have both gender (social construct) and sex (biological fact)? *NM* - 02/06/2010 11:25:36 PM 183 Views
No, people do not have a gender. - 03/06/2010 12:16:18 AM 365 Views
Re: No, people do not have a gender. - 03/06/2010 12:20:39 AM 364 Views
No, I know they aren't interchangeable. - 03/06/2010 04:24:36 AM 385 Views
I'm quite sure they decided to invent that construct. - 03/06/2010 04:35:03 AM 354 Views
The OED doesn't give any example of "minutia" being used as plural. *NM* - 02/06/2010 12:53:23 AM 160 Views
I didn't consult the OED. I feel sad for you that you felt the need to do so. - 02/06/2010 12:58:12 AM 573 Views
I think the point is that most people use "minutiae" and never use the singular. - 02/06/2010 01:02:22 AM 354 Views
Of course it has more entries. - 02/06/2010 01:12:31 AM 367 Views
let me see if I've got this.... - 02/06/2010 01:23:55 AM 558 Views
You won't be laughing when I release that licking sex picture to the mediums! - 02/06/2010 01:27:39 AM 385 Views
What will the mediums do? Commune with the ghost of Buddy Holly to get his opinion? *NM* - 02/06/2010 01:43:35 AM 171 Views
Psychic broadcast to the whole world I bet. - 02/06/2010 01:52:44 AM 345 Views
You leave Buddy Holly out of this! - 02/06/2010 03:02:19 AM 356 Views
Pronunciation in Latin - 02/06/2010 03:15:10 AM 382 Views
It's not the Latin pronunciation I was wondering about. - 02/06/2010 10:14:35 AM 358 Views
Yeah - 03/06/2010 12:23:33 AM 360 Views
I'm a classics student. Consulting dictionaries is beyond habit and approaching compulsion. - 02/06/2010 02:08:45 AM 382 Views
A sex addiction would be much more pleasurable compulsion, y'know. - 02/06/2010 02:32:51 AM 503 Views
The two aren't mutually exclusive, just kinky. *NM* - 02/06/2010 04:09:50 AM 166 Views
I think you should use the OED to find out the definition of kinky. - 02/06/2010 04:25:32 AM 386 Views
You don't think a dictionary fetish is kinky? Buddy, I don't think I'm the one needing the OED. *NM* - 02/06/2010 05:20:55 AM 178 Views
Bitch, that ain't kinky. It's just....odd. *NM* - 02/06/2010 06:28:25 AM 153 Views
Furries are also odd (but still kinky). *NM* - 02/06/2010 02:41:29 PM 175 Views
Odd is too normal a word to describe furries. *NM* - 02/06/2010 11:26:47 PM 180 Views
Kinky odd. *NM* - 02/06/2010 11:26:08 PM 173 Views

Reply to Message