It just seems unlikely that they'd really be doing that on BP's request.
Legolas Send a noteboard - 04/06/2010 01:04:04 AM
...that they're trying to do the whole "nothing to see here, move along, move along" bit. Clearly, there is quite a bit to see there. Also, what reason could they have for trying to prevent reporters and photographers from trying to do flyovers of the beaches and the Gulf itself? The public has a right to see and know what is going and not just what BP and the government want us to know.
But yeah, I don't know why else they'd do it, either. I take it that now that there's a controversy about it, they'll have to justify their policies.
What BP doesn't want you to see.
04/06/2010 12:20:43 AM
- 846 Views
Ye gods. I can see why. Those pictures certainly make an impression.
04/06/2010 12:53:14 AM
- 584 Views
The impression I get from previously reading some reporters' comments is....
04/06/2010 12:58:04 AM
- 589 Views
It just seems unlikely that they'd really be doing that on BP's request.
04/06/2010 01:04:04 AM
- 629 Views
Those are awful sights.
04/06/2010 01:14:41 AM
- 597 Views
There is reason to be hopeful.
04/06/2010 11:20:03 AM
- 538 Views
Thanks for linking this. *NM*
04/06/2010 01:57:26 AM
- 237 Views
You're welcome.
04/06/2010 11:21:39 AM
- 534 Views
I figured as much. I really appreciate it though, and the
is my appreciation smiley.
*NM*
04/06/2010 11:48:55 PM
- 236 Views


One thing I've always wondered...
04/06/2010 03:03:08 AM
- 636 Views
well for one thing once they get the oil on them they are trapped
04/06/2010 04:07:33 PM
- 517 Views
Not to downplay it, but those pictures are all of like 3 or 4 birds.
04/06/2010 03:54:18 PM
- 522 Views
Clearly all those Environmentalists were wrong.
04/06/2010 09:55:20 PM
- 615 Views
The only thing "dripping" is the drool off your chin, you mouth-breathing troll.
04/06/2010 10:41:31 PM
- 515 Views