Active Users:1340 Time:18/04/2026 12:23:37 AM
the point is, the officer is not required to show compassion, only enforce the law moondog Send a noteboard - 21/06/2010 11:53:51 PM
it's up to the discretion of the officer if he is willing to let them go, considering the circumstances. i highly doubt any court is going to reprimand the officer in the original article, he is pretty much acting in accordance with what the legal system requires of him.
"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa

"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
Reply to message
Police Officer stops man from entering ER while wife is having stroke - 20/06/2010 10:08:49 PM 1675 Views
So? - 20/06/2010 11:53:33 PM 947 Views
Seriously? - 21/06/2010 12:11:17 AM 1021 Views
Carrying a woman into the ER doesn't really scream "made up excuse" - 21/06/2010 12:24:30 AM 1440 Views
Time and place. - 21/06/2010 02:25:27 AM 1043 Views
Plus he was carrying a woman - 21/06/2010 11:40:18 AM 1088 Views
Oh please. *NM* - 21/06/2010 03:34:16 AM 471 Views
i cant even take this seriously. - 21/06/2010 04:28:12 AM 1146 Views
he clearly wasn't just "making up an excuse" though. - 21/06/2010 10:59:13 AM 1179 Views
unfortunately the law is on the officer's side, no matter whether he acted correctly - 21/06/2010 07:09:13 AM 968 Views
well this is,really, a drastically different situation - 21/06/2010 08:11:39 AM 1023 Views
the point is, the officer is not required to show compassion, only enforce the law - 21/06/2010 11:53:51 PM 882 Views
no. a officer is NOT only required to hold up the law. - 22/06/2010 12:28:05 AM 894 Views
i'm not disagreeing with you - 22/06/2010 01:25:43 AM 998 Views
except in this case (you seem to be ignoring this) - 22/06/2010 01:35:21 AM 959 Views
At the very least the officer should have let medical personnel take the woman in for treatment - 21/06/2010 02:56:30 PM 927 Views
But... - 21/06/2010 04:58:06 PM 1041 Views
"The fact is that the man broke the law" is nonsense. That's what judgment is for. - 21/06/2010 05:30:26 PM 989 Views
But you can get pulled over for going 1 mile over. - 21/06/2010 05:59:51 PM 1007 Views
the thing is... - 22/06/2010 12:29:43 AM 883 Views
But then he's have to use a cell phone while driving! Another crime! *NM* - 22/06/2010 02:41:51 AM 499 Views
Not in TN *NM* - 22/06/2010 02:02:32 PM 431 Views
This is ridiculous - 22/06/2010 03:18:03 AM 1054 Views
How exactly did I justify anything? Perhaps you missed the subject of my post. - 22/06/2010 02:28:21 PM 987 Views
I'm saying the fact that the law was broken is totally irrelevent, - 23/06/2010 02:15:56 AM 1055 Views
How can it be even slightly irrelevant, let alone "totally" so? - 25/06/2010 03:24:19 PM 920 Views
It is sad when idiocy and a lack of judgment becomes codified into law backed with enforcement power - 21/06/2010 09:56:32 PM 1516 Views
i don't even know if I'd be happy with a lawsuit - 22/06/2010 12:31:18 AM 928 Views
The cop should be fired and fined - 23/06/2010 03:40:32 PM 924 Views
You are such a bleeding heart liberal.. - 25/06/2010 03:22:42 AM 910 Views
LOL - - 25/06/2010 03:11:47 PM 914 Views

Reply to Message