Active Users:315 Time:28/04/2024 10:00:30 AM
the point is, the officer is not required to show compassion, only enforce the law moondog Send a noteboard - 21/06/2010 11:53:51 PM
it's up to the discretion of the officer if he is willing to let them go, considering the circumstances. i highly doubt any court is going to reprimand the officer in the original article, he is pretty much acting in accordance with what the legal system requires of him.
"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa

"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
Reply to message
Police Officer stops man from entering ER while wife is having stroke - 20/06/2010 10:08:49 PM 1269 Views
So? - 20/06/2010 11:53:33 PM 640 Views
Seriously? - 21/06/2010 12:11:17 AM 704 Views
Carrying a woman into the ER doesn't really scream "made up excuse" - 21/06/2010 12:24:30 AM 1101 Views
Time and place. - 21/06/2010 02:25:27 AM 718 Views
Plus he was carrying a woman - 21/06/2010 11:40:18 AM 757 Views
Oh please. *NM* - 21/06/2010 03:34:16 AM 298 Views
i cant even take this seriously. - 21/06/2010 04:28:12 AM 803 Views
he clearly wasn't just "making up an excuse" though. - 21/06/2010 10:59:13 AM 838 Views
unfortunately the law is on the officer's side, no matter whether he acted correctly - 21/06/2010 07:09:13 AM 639 Views
well this is,really, a drastically different situation - 21/06/2010 08:11:39 AM 700 Views
the point is, the officer is not required to show compassion, only enforce the law - 21/06/2010 11:53:51 PM 553 Views
no. a officer is NOT only required to hold up the law. - 22/06/2010 12:28:05 AM 561 Views
i'm not disagreeing with you - 22/06/2010 01:25:43 AM 672 Views
except in this case (you seem to be ignoring this) - 22/06/2010 01:35:21 AM 620 Views
At the very least the officer should have let medical personnel take the woman in for treatment - 21/06/2010 02:56:30 PM 649 Views
But... - 21/06/2010 04:58:06 PM 713 Views
"The fact is that the man broke the law" is nonsense. That's what judgment is for. - 21/06/2010 05:30:26 PM 672 Views
But you can get pulled over for going 1 mile over. - 21/06/2010 05:59:51 PM 706 Views
the thing is... - 22/06/2010 12:29:43 AM 556 Views
But then he's have to use a cell phone while driving! Another crime! *NM* - 22/06/2010 02:41:51 AM 321 Views
Not in TN *NM* - 22/06/2010 02:02:32 PM 263 Views
This is ridiculous - 22/06/2010 03:18:03 AM 673 Views
How exactly did I justify anything? Perhaps you missed the subject of my post. - 22/06/2010 02:28:21 PM 617 Views
I'm saying the fact that the law was broken is totally irrelevent, - 23/06/2010 02:15:56 AM 714 Views
How can it be even slightly irrelevant, let alone "totally" so? - 25/06/2010 03:24:19 PM 593 Views
It is sad when idiocy and a lack of judgment becomes codified into law backed with enforcement power - 21/06/2010 09:56:32 PM 1033 Views
i don't even know if I'd be happy with a lawsuit - 22/06/2010 12:31:18 AM 603 Views
The cop should be fired and fined - 23/06/2010 03:40:32 PM 575 Views
You are such a bleeding heart liberal.. - 25/06/2010 03:22:42 AM 588 Views
LOL - - 25/06/2010 03:11:47 PM 583 Views

Reply to Message