Active Users:345 Time:27/04/2024 06:02:19 PM
no. a officer is NOT only required to hold up the law. LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 22/06/2010 12:28:05 AM
Perhaps by standards of the law...sure. But by the standards of society they are also required to protect and aid citizens. If that woman had died because she hadn't gotten in to the hospital quickly enough, he could have been DIRECTLY responsible. That is inexcusable. You can't just FAKE a stroke. A glance at the woman's face should have told the policeman what was going on, and instead he detained them far longer than appropriate.

If the woman had been gushing blood, would he have detained the as well? Or would that have been "Serious enough" that he would have let them past without harassment?

this wasn't just a police officer stopping them on the way in to a building for treating a few red lights inappropriately...

This was a police officer actively preventing someone having a stroke from entering a hospital.

As a human being, he has no excuse and I dearly hope the police department does not hide behind their shield of papers.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Reply to message
Police Officer stops man from entering ER while wife is having stroke - 20/06/2010 10:08:49 PM 1269 Views
So? - 20/06/2010 11:53:33 PM 639 Views
Seriously? - 21/06/2010 12:11:17 AM 703 Views
Carrying a woman into the ER doesn't really scream "made up excuse" - 21/06/2010 12:24:30 AM 1101 Views
Time and place. - 21/06/2010 02:25:27 AM 717 Views
Plus he was carrying a woman - 21/06/2010 11:40:18 AM 757 Views
Oh please. *NM* - 21/06/2010 03:34:16 AM 298 Views
i cant even take this seriously. - 21/06/2010 04:28:12 AM 802 Views
he clearly wasn't just "making up an excuse" though. - 21/06/2010 10:59:13 AM 837 Views
unfortunately the law is on the officer's side, no matter whether he acted correctly - 21/06/2010 07:09:13 AM 638 Views
well this is,really, a drastically different situation - 21/06/2010 08:11:39 AM 699 Views
the point is, the officer is not required to show compassion, only enforce the law - 21/06/2010 11:53:51 PM 552 Views
no. a officer is NOT only required to hold up the law. - 22/06/2010 12:28:05 AM 561 Views
i'm not disagreeing with you - 22/06/2010 01:25:43 AM 671 Views
except in this case (you seem to be ignoring this) - 22/06/2010 01:35:21 AM 620 Views
At the very least the officer should have let medical personnel take the woman in for treatment - 21/06/2010 02:56:30 PM 648 Views
But... - 21/06/2010 04:58:06 PM 712 Views
"The fact is that the man broke the law" is nonsense. That's what judgment is for. - 21/06/2010 05:30:26 PM 671 Views
But you can get pulled over for going 1 mile over. - 21/06/2010 05:59:51 PM 705 Views
the thing is... - 22/06/2010 12:29:43 AM 555 Views
But then he's have to use a cell phone while driving! Another crime! *NM* - 22/06/2010 02:41:51 AM 320 Views
Not in TN *NM* - 22/06/2010 02:02:32 PM 262 Views
This is ridiculous - 22/06/2010 03:18:03 AM 672 Views
How exactly did I justify anything? Perhaps you missed the subject of my post. - 22/06/2010 02:28:21 PM 616 Views
I'm saying the fact that the law was broken is totally irrelevent, - 23/06/2010 02:15:56 AM 714 Views
How can it be even slightly irrelevant, let alone "totally" so? - 25/06/2010 03:24:19 PM 592 Views
It is sad when idiocy and a lack of judgment becomes codified into law backed with enforcement power - 21/06/2010 09:56:32 PM 1032 Views
i don't even know if I'd be happy with a lawsuit - 22/06/2010 12:31:18 AM 603 Views
The cop should be fired and fined - 23/06/2010 03:40:32 PM 575 Views
You are such a bleeding heart liberal.. - 25/06/2010 03:22:42 AM 588 Views
LOL - - 25/06/2010 03:11:47 PM 582 Views

Reply to Message