Active Users:545 Time:06/02/2026 08:55:03 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
BBC News Sells it's Soul - If it ever had one... Wibble Send a noteboard - 15/07/2010 09:50:52 PM
On Tuesday 3 UK soldiers were killed by a rogue Afghan soldier.

On Thursday, the BBC is proud to announce it's exclusive interview with the man responsible (they think, since they can't actually confirm anything, that'd require actual proper journalism). Read how the BBC becomes the mouthpiece for the Taliban, and accusations of the slaughter of children and civilians, thereby justifying his very act.

Way to go BBC, truly you have plumbed the depths this time, bravo, you must be proud.
News.bbc.scum
This message last edited by Wibble on 15/07/2010 at 09:51:32 PM
Reply to message
BBC News Sells it's Soul - If it ever had one... Wibble - 15/07/2010 09:50:52 PM 1202 Views
umm ok *NM* Aisha - 15/07/2010 10:03:37 PM 327 Views
wow that's low... *NM* ironclad - 15/07/2010 10:18:28 PM 296 Views
That doesn't... seem that weird? nossy - 15/07/2010 10:40:58 PM 803 Views
Looks like they're trying their best to uphold journalistic integrity in the face of public opinion lord-of-shadow - 15/07/2010 10:54:00 PM 862 Views
In fact, having now read the link a bit better... I think this is good journalism. I applaud it. lord-of-shadow - 15/07/2010 10:57:35 PM 838 Views
thats what i took away form that article Aisha - 15/07/2010 11:13:02 PM 750 Views
I suspect it is the line of thought that says giving terrorists airtime is justifying their actions. *NM* Ghavrel - 15/07/2010 11:32:37 PM 299 Views
That's what I disliked about it, yes *NM* ironclad - 15/07/2010 11:42:53 PM 315 Views
i wonder if the same logic applies to giving air time to white supremacist Aisha - 16/07/2010 02:37:43 AM 687 Views
I don't like that line of thought. Nate - 16/07/2010 02:44:41 AM 871 Views
I was going to say this*: nossy - 16/07/2010 02:47:37 AM 745 Views
The amount of newsworthy information in that article was close to zero, though ironclad - 16/07/2010 10:16:56 AM 711 Views
Perhaps you read a different article then? snoopcester - 16/07/2010 11:19:04 AM 697 Views
I agree snoopcester - 16/07/2010 11:16:25 AM 691 Views
its, not it's. i thought you were talking about the site format, which now sucks. temeraire - 16/07/2010 06:36:23 AM 719 Views
Sorry I just don't see what is upsetting you with this article random thoughts - 16/07/2010 03:12:24 PM 738 Views
You just agreed with snoopcester about something. nossy - 16/07/2010 08:07:15 PM 682 Views
well hell really hasn't frozen over yet random thoughts - 16/07/2010 11:14:31 PM 857 Views
I'd rather have an unbiased source of information BlackAdder - 17/07/2010 12:19:39 AM 778 Views
Ditto snoopcester - 17/07/2010 12:28:39 AM 674 Views
that is funny coming from the guy who reads the Guardian random thoughts - 17/07/2010 03:12:05 PM 630 Views
I'd guess I actually spend more time reading the Daily Telegraph snoopcester - 17/07/2010 04:15:43 PM 667 Views
Whoa nossy - 17/07/2010 08:59:35 PM 825 Views
Not at me, surely. I'm adorable. *NM* Ghavrel - 17/07/2010 10:07:15 PM 313 Views
Pft, evil most often hides behind "adorable." *NM* nossy - 17/07/2010 10:34:22 PM 279 Views
you wouldn't know an unbiased source if it bit you random thoughts - 17/07/2010 03:09:46 PM 668 Views
"loony left"? BlackAdder - 17/07/2010 11:40:41 PM 716 Views
Sorry man. everynametaken - 16/07/2010 11:54:38 PM 651 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes