Active Users:748 Time:10/12/2025 03:30:50 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
umm ok *NM* Aisha Send a noteboard - 15/07/2010 10:03:37 PM
On Tuesday 3 UK soldiers were killed by a rogue Afghan soldier.

On Thursday, the BBC is proud to announce it's exclusive interview with the man responsible (they think, since they can't actually confirm anything, that'd require actual proper journalism). Read how the BBC becomes the mouthpiece for the Taliban, and accusations of the slaughter of children and civilians, thereby justifying his very act.

Way to go BBC, truly you have plumbed the depths this time, bravo, you must be proud.
Aisha - formerly known as randschicka
Reply to message
BBC News Sells it's Soul - If it ever had one... Wibble - 15/07/2010 09:50:52 PM 1171 Views
umm ok *NM* Aisha - 15/07/2010 10:03:37 PM 321 Views
wow that's low... *NM* ironclad - 15/07/2010 10:18:28 PM 288 Views
That doesn't... seem that weird? nossy - 15/07/2010 10:40:58 PM 784 Views
Looks like they're trying their best to uphold journalistic integrity in the face of public opinion lord-of-shadow - 15/07/2010 10:54:00 PM 842 Views
In fact, having now read the link a bit better... I think this is good journalism. I applaud it. lord-of-shadow - 15/07/2010 10:57:35 PM 826 Views
thats what i took away form that article Aisha - 15/07/2010 11:13:02 PM 732 Views
I suspect it is the line of thought that says giving terrorists airtime is justifying their actions. *NM* Ghavrel - 15/07/2010 11:32:37 PM 289 Views
That's what I disliked about it, yes *NM* ironclad - 15/07/2010 11:42:53 PM 304 Views
i wonder if the same logic applies to giving air time to white supremacist Aisha - 16/07/2010 02:37:43 AM 668 Views
I don't like that line of thought. Nate - 16/07/2010 02:44:41 AM 853 Views
I was going to say this*: nossy - 16/07/2010 02:47:37 AM 724 Views
The amount of newsworthy information in that article was close to zero, though ironclad - 16/07/2010 10:16:56 AM 692 Views
Perhaps you read a different article then? snoopcester - 16/07/2010 11:19:04 AM 679 Views
I agree snoopcester - 16/07/2010 11:16:25 AM 664 Views
its, not it's. i thought you were talking about the site format, which now sucks. temeraire - 16/07/2010 06:36:23 AM 696 Views
Sorry I just don't see what is upsetting you with this article random thoughts - 16/07/2010 03:12:24 PM 723 Views
You just agreed with snoopcester about something. nossy - 16/07/2010 08:07:15 PM 657 Views
well hell really hasn't frozen over yet random thoughts - 16/07/2010 11:14:31 PM 837 Views
I'd rather have an unbiased source of information BlackAdder - 17/07/2010 12:19:39 AM 762 Views
Ditto snoopcester - 17/07/2010 12:28:39 AM 654 Views
that is funny coming from the guy who reads the Guardian random thoughts - 17/07/2010 03:12:05 PM 612 Views
I'd guess I actually spend more time reading the Daily Telegraph snoopcester - 17/07/2010 04:15:43 PM 639 Views
Whoa nossy - 17/07/2010 08:59:35 PM 797 Views
Not at me, surely. I'm adorable. *NM* Ghavrel - 17/07/2010 10:07:15 PM 303 Views
Pft, evil most often hides behind "adorable." *NM* nossy - 17/07/2010 10:34:22 PM 273 Views
you wouldn't know an unbiased source if it bit you random thoughts - 17/07/2010 03:09:46 PM 647 Views
"loony left"? BlackAdder - 17/07/2010 11:40:41 PM 697 Views
Sorry man. everynametaken - 16/07/2010 11:54:38 PM 632 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Formatting
Smiley Codes