On Tuesday 3 UK soldiers were killed by a rogue Afghan soldier.
On Thursday, the BBC is proud to announce it's exclusive interview with the man responsible (they think, since they can't actually confirm anything, that'd require actual proper journalism). Read how the BBC becomes the mouthpiece for the Taliban, and accusations of the slaughter of children and civilians, thereby justifying his very act.
Way to go BBC, truly you have plumbed the depths this time, bravo, you must be proud.
On Thursday, the BBC is proud to announce it's exclusive interview with the man responsible (they think, since they can't actually confirm anything, that'd require actual proper journalism). Read how the BBC becomes the mouthpiece for the Taliban, and accusations of the slaughter of children and civilians, thereby justifying his very act.
Way to go BBC, truly you have plumbed the depths this time, bravo, you must be proud.
I hate that those soldiers died. I hate what he did to them and I hope they catch him and execute him. But the article was rather simplistic and he called them. It wasn't like they contacted somebody to get an exclusive from the killer of three Brit troops to beat out everyone else from getting the story. He reported the man's claims and made it clear in the article that it was just his opinion and not substantiated fact.
At least we know why the guy did what he did, before the interview nobody knew. I feel for the three soldiers who died but I am not sure what you are outraged about.
But wine was the great assassin of both tradition and propriety...
-Brandon Sanderson, The Way of Kings
-Brandon Sanderson, The Way of Kings
BBC News Sells it's Soul - If it ever had one...
- 15/07/2010 09:50:52 PM
1303 Views
Looks like they're trying their best to uphold journalistic integrity in the face of public opinion
- 15/07/2010 10:54:00 PM
945 Views
In fact, having now read the link a bit better... I think this is good journalism. I applaud it.
- 15/07/2010 10:57:35 PM
927 Views
thats what i took away form that article
- 15/07/2010 11:13:02 PM
844 Views
I suspect it is the line of thought that says giving terrorists airtime is justifying their actions. *NM*
- 15/07/2010 11:32:37 PM
338 Views
i wonder if the same logic applies to giving air time to white supremacist
- 16/07/2010 02:37:43 AM
771 Views
I don't like that line of thought.
- 16/07/2010 02:44:41 AM
963 Views
I was going to say this*:
- 16/07/2010 02:47:37 AM
826 Views
The amount of newsworthy information in that article was close to zero, though
- 16/07/2010 10:16:56 AM
798 Views
its, not it's. i thought you were talking about the site format, which now sucks.
- 16/07/2010 06:36:23 AM
817 Views
Sorry I just don't see what is upsetting you with this article
- 16/07/2010 03:12:24 PM
820 Views
You just agreed with snoopcester about something.
- 16/07/2010 08:07:15 PM
767 Views
well hell really hasn't frozen over yet
- 16/07/2010 11:14:31 PM
947 Views
I'd rather have an unbiased source of information
- 17/07/2010 12:19:39 AM
879 Views
Ditto
- 17/07/2010 12:28:39 AM
763 Views
that is funny coming from the guy who reads the Guardian
- 17/07/2010 03:12:05 PM
713 Views
Whoa
- 17/07/2010 08:59:35 PM
919 Views
Sorry man.
- 16/07/2010 11:54:38 PM
746 Views