If the NCAA wants him out of the game for a year, then they should suspend him for a year. I'd be fine with that, no matter how you cut it, there is no denying that he has been charged with robbery on 2 separate occasions, and the traffic charge added in there should be more than enough for them to justify a suspension if need be. I just don't like the fact that they seem to be treating him differently because he's a big name.
The NCAA gets something right! 
- 01/09/2010 04:57:20 PM
494 Views
- 01/09/2010 04:57:20 PM
494 Views
Meh, I'm not sure it was the right call
- 01/09/2010 05:13:01 PM
285 Views
but in this case it was related to commiting a crime
- 01/09/2010 05:20:02 PM
267 Views
His crimes aren't really open and shut cases though...more the variety of wrong place wrong time
- 01/09/2010 05:31:21 PM
271 Views
Why not? That's how life works.
- 01/09/2010 07:13:20 PM
276 Views
The possession charge was a simple civil infraction
- 01/09/2010 08:40:54 PM
263 Views
I generally agree with Lady L ...
- 01/09/2010 08:12:45 PM
250 Views
I just really don't like the double standard
- 01/09/2010 08:46:31 PM
269 Views
I agree with you.
- 01/09/2010 09:23:25 PM
240 Views
and coincidently changes his mind RIGHT AFTER Oregon tells him he can't play?
- 01/09/2010 09:27:51 PM
251 Views
I do have to agree with the blount situation you mentioned above ...
- 02/09/2010 03:39:37 AM
255 Views
it's good to see the rules work properly
- 01/09/2010 05:17:25 PM
291 Views
I actually never thought about ...
- 01/09/2010 07:33:49 PM
270 Views
most of the rules were created due to the actions of football or basketball players
- 01/09/2010 07:46:00 PM
338 Views
Decision appealed and reversed, by the way. Guess the NCAA doesn't agree with you after all. *NM*
- 04/09/2010 03:45:40 PM
109 Views
Nope, no it doesn't. *NM*
- 04/09/2010 09:04:49 PM
113 Views
Karma, baby!
- 05/09/2010 06:10:46 PM
239 Views
It wasn't really his fault though that his defense stunk it up. He did his part. *NM*
- 05/09/2010 07:30:42 PM
114 Views