You typically are held accountable for your stupidity at a job.
Jacob Send a noteboard - 13/09/2010 09:13:39 PM
nanny-state ftw!!!
If you do stupid things, take pictures of them (another stupid thing), post them on a public social network page (another stupid thing), you have then established a pattern of behavior that employers can take into account. If you've got several qualified applicants, and these days all jobs do, that public information is just another piece of information... especially if that job has any public/social aspect to it.
HR looks at facebook.
13/09/2010 07:07:35 PM
- 1011 Views
my brother's girlfriend got fired because of a facebook picture
13/09/2010 07:53:03 PM
- 751 Views
Re: my brother's girlfriend got fired because of a facebook picture
13/09/2010 10:17:41 PM
- 670 Views
Was it supposed to be a HIPAA violation or something?
14/09/2010 10:41:44 PM
- 655 Views
I would say it was because she was letting unauthorized people handle babies under intensive care.
14/09/2010 10:55:45 PM
- 596 Views
I wish they would've fired my coworker.
14/09/2010 10:54:48 PM
- 587 Views
Public is public is public.
13/09/2010 08:28:19 PM
- 613 Views
no one should have to be accountable for their stupidity!!!
13/09/2010 09:07:01 PM
- 666 Views
You typically are held accountable for your stupidity at a job.
13/09/2010 09:13:39 PM
- 580 Views
Who? *NM*
13/09/2010 08:53:00 PM
- 312 Views
Human resources. *NM*
13/09/2010 09:04:14 PM
- 280 Views
Thanks. Why not write that, April? *NM*
13/09/2010 10:34:02 PM
- 323 Views
Because HR is a very widely used abbreviation in the English-speaking world.
*NM*
13/09/2010 11:11:56 PM
- 322 Views

It's really a word in itself by now. *NM*
13/09/2010 11:29:04 PM
- 274 Views
Hmpf *NM*
14/09/2010 08:15:33 AM
- 326 Views
What does that stand for? Something with ridiculously too many letters and in German, no doubt. *NM*
15/09/2010 12:43:40 AM
- 288 Views
Hot Redheads. *NM*
13/09/2010 10:23:12 PM
- 293 Views
Eh, no biggie.
14/09/2010 02:16:37 AM
- 559 Views
Where it might be justified would be if the employee had just called into work
14/09/2010 02:55:00 AM
- 584 Views
That's the stupidity clause.
14/09/2010 03:00:30 AM
- 560 Views

maybe it should or it shouldn't...but it does
14/09/2010 04:26:50 AM
- 588 Views
lol, I guess we have different ideas of "simply living."
14/09/2010 05:00:47 AM
- 516 Views

I'd say in that specific case...
14/09/2010 06:11:48 AM
- 574 Views
Huh, it's all the rage here
14/09/2010 02:01:11 PM
- 643 Views
I don't think HR should be looking at what people do outside of work, it seems unethical
14/09/2010 10:42:37 AM
- 532 Views
They shouldn't, but I would expect them to.
14/09/2010 02:08:07 PM
- 589 Views
I agree.
14/09/2010 10:46:12 PM
- 549 Views