You typically are held accountable for your stupidity at a job.
Jacob Send a noteboard - 13/09/2010 09:13:39 PM
nanny-state ftw!!!
If you do stupid things, take pictures of them (another stupid thing), post them on a public social network page (another stupid thing), you have then established a pattern of behavior that employers can take into account. If you've got several qualified applicants, and these days all jobs do, that public information is just another piece of information... especially if that job has any public/social aspect to it.
HR looks at facebook.
13/09/2010 07:07:35 PM
- 1039 Views
my brother's girlfriend got fired because of a facebook picture
13/09/2010 07:53:03 PM
- 772 Views
Re: my brother's girlfriend got fired because of a facebook picture
13/09/2010 10:17:41 PM
- 687 Views
Was it supposed to be a HIPAA violation or something?
14/09/2010 10:41:44 PM
- 676 Views
I would say it was because she was letting unauthorized people handle babies under intensive care.
14/09/2010 10:55:45 PM
- 617 Views
I wish they would've fired my coworker.
14/09/2010 10:54:48 PM
- 606 Views
Public is public is public.
13/09/2010 08:28:19 PM
- 632 Views
no one should have to be accountable for their stupidity!!!
13/09/2010 09:07:01 PM
- 682 Views
You typically are held accountable for your stupidity at a job.
13/09/2010 09:13:39 PM
- 601 Views
Who? *NM*
13/09/2010 08:53:00 PM
- 321 Views
Human resources. *NM*
13/09/2010 09:04:14 PM
- 288 Views
Thanks. Why not write that, April? *NM*
13/09/2010 10:34:02 PM
- 329 Views
Because HR is a very widely used abbreviation in the English-speaking world.
*NM*
13/09/2010 11:11:56 PM
- 328 Views

It's really a word in itself by now. *NM*
13/09/2010 11:29:04 PM
- 281 Views
Hmpf *NM*
14/09/2010 08:15:33 AM
- 335 Views
What does that stand for? Something with ridiculously too many letters and in German, no doubt. *NM*
15/09/2010 12:43:40 AM
- 295 Views
Hot Redheads. *NM*
13/09/2010 10:23:12 PM
- 302 Views
Eh, no biggie.
14/09/2010 02:16:37 AM
- 579 Views
Where it might be justified would be if the employee had just called into work
14/09/2010 02:55:00 AM
- 605 Views
That's the stupidity clause.
14/09/2010 03:00:30 AM
- 580 Views

maybe it should or it shouldn't...but it does
14/09/2010 04:26:50 AM
- 604 Views
lol, I guess we have different ideas of "simply living."
14/09/2010 05:00:47 AM
- 536 Views

I'd say in that specific case...
14/09/2010 06:11:48 AM
- 600 Views
Huh, it's all the rage here
14/09/2010 02:01:11 PM
- 664 Views
I don't think HR should be looking at what people do outside of work, it seems unethical
14/09/2010 10:42:37 AM
- 552 Views
They shouldn't, but I would expect them to.
14/09/2010 02:08:07 PM
- 610 Views
I agree.
14/09/2010 10:46:12 PM
- 569 Views