You typically are held accountable for your stupidity at a job.
Jacob Send a noteboard - 13/09/2010 09:13:39 PM
nanny-state ftw!!!
If you do stupid things, take pictures of them (another stupid thing), post them on a public social network page (another stupid thing), you have then established a pattern of behavior that employers can take into account. If you've got several qualified applicants, and these days all jobs do, that public information is just another piece of information... especially if that job has any public/social aspect to it.
HR looks at facebook.
- 13/09/2010 07:07:35 PM
1086 Views
my brother's girlfriend got fired because of a facebook picture
- 13/09/2010 07:53:03 PM
824 Views
Re: my brother's girlfriend got fired because of a facebook picture
- 13/09/2010 10:17:41 PM
740 Views
Was it supposed to be a HIPAA violation or something?
- 14/09/2010 10:41:44 PM
726 Views
I would say it was because she was letting unauthorized people handle babies under intensive care.
- 14/09/2010 10:55:45 PM
660 Views
I wish they would've fired my coworker.
- 14/09/2010 10:54:48 PM
654 Views
Public is public is public.
- 13/09/2010 08:28:19 PM
675 Views
no one should have to be accountable for their stupidity!!!
- 13/09/2010 09:07:01 PM
731 Views
You typically are held accountable for your stupidity at a job.
- 13/09/2010 09:13:39 PM
650 Views
Who? *NM*
- 13/09/2010 08:53:00 PM
342 Views
Human resources. *NM*
- 13/09/2010 09:04:14 PM
308 Views
Thanks. Why not write that, April? *NM*
- 13/09/2010 10:34:02 PM
351 Views
Because HR is a very widely used abbreviation in the English-speaking world.
*NM*
- 13/09/2010 11:11:56 PM
348 Views
*NM*
- 13/09/2010 11:11:56 PM
348 Views
It's really a word in itself by now. *NM*
- 13/09/2010 11:29:04 PM
306 Views
Hmpf *NM*
- 14/09/2010 08:15:33 AM
358 Views
What does that stand for? Something with ridiculously too many letters and in German, no doubt. *NM*
- 15/09/2010 12:43:40 AM
314 Views
Hot Redheads. *NM*
- 13/09/2010 10:23:12 PM
322 Views
Eh, no biggie.
- 14/09/2010 02:16:37 AM
631 Views
Where it might be justified would be if the employee had just called into work
- 14/09/2010 02:55:00 AM
651 Views
That's the stupidity clause.
- 14/09/2010 03:00:30 AM
627 Views
- 14/09/2010 03:00:30 AM
627 Views
maybe it should or it shouldn't...but it does
- 14/09/2010 04:26:50 AM
654 Views
lol, I guess we have different ideas of "simply living."
- 14/09/2010 05:00:47 AM
583 Views
- 14/09/2010 05:00:47 AM
583 Views
I'd say in that specific case...
- 14/09/2010 06:11:48 AM
648 Views
Huh, it's all the rage here
- 14/09/2010 02:01:11 PM
711 Views
I don't think HR should be looking at what people do outside of work, it seems unethical
- 14/09/2010 10:42:37 AM
591 Views
They shouldn't, but I would expect them to.
- 14/09/2010 02:08:07 PM
655 Views
I agree.
- 14/09/2010 10:46:12 PM
621 Views
