I'm aware people are held accountable at their jobs. I was mocking the people who would say that your employers shouldn't be forbidden to use your facebook page against you, instead of simply behaving better or keeping their facebook private.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
This message last edited by LadyLorraine on 13/09/2010 at 11:12:01 PM
HR looks at facebook.
- 13/09/2010 07:07:35 PM
1083 Views
my brother's girlfriend got fired because of a facebook picture
- 13/09/2010 07:53:03 PM
821 Views
Re: my brother's girlfriend got fired because of a facebook picture
- 13/09/2010 10:17:41 PM
737 Views
Was it supposed to be a HIPAA violation or something?
- 14/09/2010 10:41:44 PM
723 Views
I would say it was because she was letting unauthorized people handle babies under intensive care.
- 14/09/2010 10:55:45 PM
657 Views
I wish they would've fired my coworker.
- 14/09/2010 10:54:48 PM
652 Views
Public is public is public.
- 13/09/2010 08:28:19 PM
672 Views
no one should have to be accountable for their stupidity!!!
- 13/09/2010 09:07:01 PM
729 Views
You typically are held accountable for your stupidity at a job.
- 13/09/2010 09:13:39 PM
647 Views
*turns on your sarcasm detection*
- 13/09/2010 11:10:29 PM
651 Views
Who? *NM*
- 13/09/2010 08:53:00 PM
341 Views
Human resources. *NM*
- 13/09/2010 09:04:14 PM
307 Views
Thanks. Why not write that, April? *NM*
- 13/09/2010 10:34:02 PM
350 Views
Because HR is a very widely used abbreviation in the English-speaking world.
*NM*
- 13/09/2010 11:11:56 PM
347 Views
*NM*
- 13/09/2010 11:11:56 PM
347 Views
It's really a word in itself by now. *NM*
- 13/09/2010 11:29:04 PM
305 Views
Hmpf *NM*
- 14/09/2010 08:15:33 AM
357 Views
What does that stand for? Something with ridiculously too many letters and in German, no doubt. *NM*
- 15/09/2010 12:43:40 AM
313 Views
Hot Redheads. *NM*
- 13/09/2010 10:23:12 PM
321 Views
Eh, no biggie.
- 14/09/2010 02:16:37 AM
628 Views
Where it might be justified would be if the employee had just called into work
- 14/09/2010 02:55:00 AM
649 Views
That's the stupidity clause.
- 14/09/2010 03:00:30 AM
624 Views
- 14/09/2010 03:00:30 AM
624 Views
maybe it should or it shouldn't...but it does
- 14/09/2010 04:26:50 AM
652 Views
lol, I guess we have different ideas of "simply living."
- 14/09/2010 05:00:47 AM
581 Views
- 14/09/2010 05:00:47 AM
581 Views
I'd say in that specific case...
- 14/09/2010 06:11:48 AM
645 Views
Huh, it's all the rage here
- 14/09/2010 02:01:11 PM
709 Views
I don't think HR should be looking at what people do outside of work, it seems unethical
- 14/09/2010 10:42:37 AM
588 Views
They shouldn't, but I would expect them to.
- 14/09/2010 02:08:07 PM
652 Views
I agree.
- 14/09/2010 10:46:12 PM
618 Views
