Active Users:715 Time:30/10/2026 04:49:25 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I'm with the other people responding. Tom Send a noteboard - 29/09/2010 09:18:50 PM
You can disagree with her conflation of the terms "Muslim" and "terrorist", but the point is that nothing she is saying or doing is taken out of context, nor are the words of her opponent. If he hasn't stated a position on the mosque, he hasn't stated a position.

In this case, a person's words are being ripped from their context to directly make voters think that he is saying something that he is emphatically not saying.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Scuzziest politcal ad of the season... so far Isaac - 29/09/2010 08:06:19 PM 1440 Views
Wow...that reminds me of Homer Simpson looking for that "sweet, sweet can". Tom - 29/09/2010 08:31:35 PM 1088 Views
You think that's worse than Renee Elmer's one in North Carolina? Napoleon62 - 29/09/2010 08:38:30 PM 1438 Views
you may not like her position but it isn't a blatant lie random thoughts - 29/09/2010 08:47:44 PM 1087 Views
Yes, much Isaac - 29/09/2010 08:55:38 PM 1079 Views
The ad didn't make me cringe, but the interview afterward certainly did BlackAdder - 29/09/2010 09:07:06 PM 1017 Views
Yeah... oh dear, this is painful. Legolas - 29/09/2010 09:37:26 PM 1014 Views
I'm with the other people responding. Tom - 29/09/2010 09:18:50 PM 1092 Views
I despise them both. In their own way they are both disgusting, manipulative, ignorant tools. Tashmere - 30/09/2010 03:46:36 AM 952 Views
The bad news he will lose in November random thoughts - 29/09/2010 08:42:22 PM 1018 Views
His name is Daniel Webster. That is awesome *NM* BlackAdder - 29/09/2010 09:02:15 PM 508 Views
To be fair... Phelix - 29/09/2010 11:59:33 PM 1139 Views
What little I found in the time I had... Tashmere - 30/09/2010 04:02:51 AM 1182 Views
Why should a woman get alimony for cheating on her husband? random thoughts - 30/09/2010 05:23:03 AM 1035 Views
Because the law in question only eliminated it for women. Phelix - 30/09/2010 05:27:12 AM 1474 Views
What law? Isaac - 30/09/2010 07:49:59 PM 1119 Views
Shedding a little light on the "Law" in question. Tashmere - 01/10/2010 12:40:00 AM 1188 Views
You can argue almost any position but that doesn’t make it right random thoughts - 30/09/2010 08:17:03 PM 1157 Views
Poor life choices? Legolas - 30/09/2010 09:46:14 PM 1128 Views
I did say in rare case they deserve limited alimony random thoughts - 30/09/2010 10:47:39 PM 1188 Views
I'm not saying that alimony should be very high, of course. Legolas - 30/09/2010 11:27:08 PM 1105 Views
This is why I hate politics. *NM* Darth_Katie - 30/09/2010 12:11:08 AM 482 Views
Pathetic. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 30/09/2010 12:25:52 AM 526 Views
I like how he disabled comments for the video. Pussy. *NM* everynametaken - 30/09/2010 06:40:57 AM 505 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes