Active Users:773 Time:05/08/2025 10:08:08 PM
Re: It would not take a genius to know there would probably be violence. ponder stibbons Send a noteboard - 02/10/2010 10:26:40 AM
According the posted article people were chaining themselves to tress and had brought tarps to defend themselves against water cannon. 1000 police officers in riot gear showed up so it can't have been much of a surprise.

Now they may or may not have done anything to deserve the violence, I really don't know, but they should have known it was likely to get ugly.


As I mentioned before, the tarps were there because people had been camping in nasty weather. And it wasn't the first demo here, we've had dozens since last year. Weekly in the beginning, twice a week after the working had started. None of them went violent.
The normal way it goes if you stand in the way of the police on such occasions is this: You get warned three times, and you get time to walk away during and after the warnings. If you don't, you get carried away by the police, get a fine (usually 80 €) and that's it.
This time (according to eye-witnesses and footage available on the internet): no warnings, whoever was in the way of police putting fences down in the park was watered, peppered and/or beaten.
I'll be more enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when
there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it.
-- (Terry Pratchett, alt.fan.pratchett)
Reply to message
Stuttgart, Germany, September 30th 2010 - 01/10/2010 03:32:58 PM 1331 Views
That is shocking. *NM* - 01/10/2010 04:23:29 PM 558 Views
Yeah really sad that it had to come this far *NM* - 01/10/2010 04:43:07 PM 506 Views
That's horrible. - 01/10/2010 04:57:39 PM 970 Views
There's an even better one - 02/10/2010 01:13:29 AM 1119 Views
the parents should be ashamed for bringing their kids there - 01/10/2010 06:11:04 PM 1087 Views
er... I thought you missed some vital points (or I forgot to mention them) - 02/10/2010 12:53:20 AM 1193 Views
know I just noticed point in your article you over looked - 02/10/2010 04:27:47 AM 1089 Views
Yeah, I'm gonna have to kind of agree with you. - 02/10/2010 07:34:12 AM 943 Views
the article was wrong on both points - 02/10/2010 10:16:46 AM 975 Views
That's irrelevant. - 02/10/2010 10:59:35 AM 929 Views
Re: That's irrelevant. - 02/10/2010 11:43:43 AM 1695 Views
Youths can organise themselves; we're talking about children. - 02/10/2010 01:11:01 PM 1001 Views
Re: Youths can organise themselves; we're talking about children. - 02/10/2010 02:40:46 PM 1755 Views
No, I, uh, I think we're still not talking about the same thing. - 02/10/2010 04:04:36 PM 1025 Views
I think I got that one about the police - 02/10/2010 04:25:59 PM 1791 Views
I went to lots of demonstrations when I was a kid - 02/10/2010 10:23:04 AM 992 Views
. . . as a child? *NM* - 02/10/2010 10:46:52 AM 488 Views
I think I was 12 on my first one. - 02/10/2010 10:49:33 AM 1059 Views
You're gonna have to share this story. - 02/10/2010 11:00:58 AM 955 Views
I was a political kid! - 02/10/2010 11:03:36 AM 957 Views
Well, your freaky childhood behaviour aside. . . - 02/10/2010 11:08:36 AM 935 Views
Re: Well, your freaky childhood behaviour aside. . . - 02/10/2010 11:10:21 AM 1018 Views
Or they didn't have good reason to expect voilence. Which would seem more likely here. *NM* - 02/10/2010 01:14:41 AM 489 Views
It would not take a genius to know there would probably be violence. - 02/10/2010 04:38:52 AM 1011 Views
Re: It would not take a genius to know there would probably be violence. - 02/10/2010 10:26:40 AM 1734 Views
I read this about it - 02/10/2010 01:18:16 AM 968 Views
it is really hard to tell the difference - 02/10/2010 01:30:24 AM 1143 Views
Even then it is? - 02/10/2010 01:39:52 AM 1027 Views
That really is quite shocking. *NM* - 02/10/2010 10:25:22 AM 523 Views

Reply to Message