Maybe he should've ditched the monarchy and assumed power directly, but that isn't always popular Beyond the Sea. People have even staged revolutions to replace one monarch with yet another, raising the question of whether people who accept the monarchy as legal but nonetheless rebel fully grasp the meanings of "monarch", "rebel" and "legal. " 
But, once again, you can't control whether your boss' son is an idiot. Hence we move from Adam to Adams; virtue isn't hereditary, but that can be a hard sell (even when the heir to the throne is Edward VIII without the charisma. )
But, once again, you can't control whether your boss' son is an idiot. Hence we move from Adam to Adams; virtue isn't hereditary, but that can be a hard sell (even when the heir to the throne is Edward VIII without the charisma. )Which goes back to what I said - don't put the weapon in their hand if you can't put safety catches on it.
Given a choice between allowing my native country to remain partitioned and controlled by foreign states as it had been for centuries, or forging it into an independent power despite knowing I have no control over who'll lead it after I'm gone, I'd do what Bismarck did. It's not like denying his own country that "weapon" would protect them from it; an idiot in another country could gain control of one as powerful or greater. The only difference would be that Germany would be as prostrate as it had been before others for centuries. That's not something any one man can entirely control, but if Bismarck couldn't ensure no German leader would be seduced by power, he could and did do a great deal to ensure they wouldn't be helpless victims if a French or Russian leader were similarly seduced. I mean, geez, can you imagine the Confederation of the Rhine trying to face down Stalin? That goes about as well as it did against Napoleon.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
The position of Prussia in Germany will not be determined by its liberalism but by its power
- 14/10/2010 09:24:57 AM
1425 Views
Yes, and how'd that go for you
- 14/10/2010 10:14:19 AM
1053 Views
Not that I wanna defend a militaristic and nationalistic post I don't agree with...
- 14/10/2010 10:37:11 AM
1019 Views
That's really not fair.
- 14/10/2010 12:57:15 PM
1156 Views
</taking things too seriously>
- 14/10/2010 01:01:12 PM
892 Views
He has good points, though. *NM*
- 14/10/2010 01:16:46 PM
521 Views
Just not a sense of humour or a knowledge of American geography
- 14/10/2010 02:16:27 PM
818 Views
I have a sense of humor!
- 14/10/2010 03:21:56 PM
883 Views
Pfft, you just have some knock of version, as the shoddy spelling shows.
- 14/10/2010 03:24:46 PM
859 Views
A sense of humor only helps if something is actually funny 
*NM*
- 14/10/2010 08:14:25 PM
529 Views
*NM*
- 14/10/2010 08:14:25 PM
529 Views
You have to have a sense of humour ro know if something is funny *wins*
- 14/10/2010 09:54:12 PM
872 Views
Right, so his actions led to it
- 14/10/2010 02:29:08 PM
911 Views
By that logic it's Adams fault.
- 14/10/2010 03:12:22 PM
904 Views
Adams?
- 14/10/2010 03:28:30 PM
873 Views
The one married to Eve, not the one from wotmania.
- 14/10/2010 05:23:24 PM
1041 Views
I was more confused if you meant "Adam's" or "Adams'", it was not at all clear
- 14/10/2010 07:18:25 PM
1054 Views
- 14/10/2010 07:18:25 PM
1054 Views
Well, at different points I meant each.
- 14/10/2010 07:49:24 PM
1084 Views
- 14/10/2010 07:49:24 PM
1084 Views
Wow, that was really obnoxious. *NM*
- 14/10/2010 02:07:19 PM
526 Views
*NM*
- 14/10/2010 02:07:19 PM
526 Views
Still bitter, heh? Typical kraut, just can't accept the result
- 14/10/2010 02:30:46 PM
909 Views
- 14/10/2010 02:30:46 PM
909 Views
And/or I just find you annoying.
- 14/10/2010 06:10:05 PM
895 Views
- 14/10/2010 06:10:05 PM
895 Views
Well
- 14/10/2010 07:29:23 PM
894 Views
*NM*
SEIG HEIL! *NM*
- 14/10/2010 10:43:42 AM
472 Views
If only I got an Euro each time someone misspelled this crap *NM*
- 14/10/2010 10:58:22 AM
435 Views
SIEG HEIL! *NM*
- 14/10/2010 11:00:02 AM
405 Views
Also, wrong century. *NM*
- 14/10/2010 11:07:26 AM
543 Views
Yeah, well, that speech was given in 1863 and there was no Kaiser tell 1871 so go correct Otto *NM*
- 14/10/2010 11:09:44 AM
527 Views
At least spell his name correctly if you're going to quote him.
- 14/10/2010 11:39:33 AM
914 Views
I didn't even notice (s)he'd not spelt it with the "c" *NM*
- 14/10/2010 11:42:53 AM
370 Views
STOP IMPERSONATING MY HUBBY!!!!
- 14/10/2010 01:25:29 PM
969 Views
I suggest a permanent change
Wait, that wasn't you? *NM*
- 14/10/2010 01:36:21 PM
390 Views
*NM*
- 14/10/2010 01:36:21 PM
390 Views
She spelled the name correctly, with the "c". *NM*
- 14/10/2010 01:51:19 PM
432 Views
*NM*
- 14/10/2010 01:51:19 PM
432 Views
I assumed that was a double bluff! *NM*
- 14/10/2010 02:16:37 PM
388 Views
You should've known better: she's way to fastidious about her Germans to do so even in jest. lol *NM*
- 14/10/2010 03:42:11 PM
378 Views