Active Users:1594 Time:29/04/2026 12:43:39 AM
Bullshit, the SSD will make more of a difference than the extra memory Roland00 Send a noteboard - 23/10/2010 04:38:44 AM
The more ram than 4 GB will not be faster than an SSD. In real life scenarios 95% of the people out there will not use more than 4 GB of memory. So what does windows 7 use with that extra memory, it uses Superfetch to load the most common used programs into memory. Problem is even with 8gb of memory (4 real and 4 superfetch) you can't load your entire OS into memory let alone your most common load programs.

SSD feel fast not because of the raw transfer speed but because of random access times (how long of latency it takes to pull the harddrive). Hard drives have latencies about 10 ms, while ssd have latencies of .1 ms or a factor difference of about 100. Anytime the computer has to get something off the harddrive the computer just "waits" until that information is pulled, the SSD more or less eliminates this waiting time, while it is still there on a hard drive. Now the difference between 10 ms or .1 doesn't seem like much but when you are pulling thousands of miniature files (which is how the OS works, all these dll, drivers, and files) those thousands of files means the difference between 10 seconds of waiting and 1/10th of a second.

Trust me once you go SSD you won't go back, SSD are now cheap it is easy to find an SSD for less than 2 dollars a GB, that is all you need to install your OS and all your programs (with the exception of games, but that is what the 1 TB is for.)

Edit: I forgot to put a not in sentence number 2.
This message last edited by Roland00 on 23/10/2010 at 05:26:44 AM
Reply to message
My computer died last night - 22/10/2010 04:04:46 AM 1028 Views
My sympathies. 6 years is a good life though. You should be proud! *NM* - 22/10/2010 06:16:13 AM 382 Views
I would just get a new one - 22/10/2010 06:58:02 AM 855 Views
6 years old? Don't just replace the HD - build a new one, if you have the cash. - 22/10/2010 01:35:08 PM 812 Views
Re: 6 years old? Don't just replace the HD - build a new one, if you have the cash. - 22/10/2010 05:30:03 PM 924 Views
Huh? - 23/10/2010 04:24:24 AM 849 Views
My deepest condolences. - 22/10/2010 01:39:01 PM 819 Views
I'm with Morgawse - 22/10/2010 04:58:39 PM 789 Views
If it is 6 years old get a new one *NM* - 22/10/2010 05:23:39 PM 402 Views
OK, you guys are probably right - 22/10/2010 05:51:23 PM 835 Views
Re: OK, you guys are probably right - 22/10/2010 06:38:49 PM 1071 Views
Re: OK, you guys are probably right - 22/10/2010 06:53:56 PM 795 Views
One thing about that site, though - 22/10/2010 06:57:56 PM 824 Views
Re: One thing about that site, though - 22/10/2010 07:01:54 PM 823 Views
What he said. - 24/10/2010 09:01:49 AM 947 Views
There is no motherboard that can accept both socket types - 24/10/2010 01:47:39 PM 791 Views
If you're trying to conserve money, don't bother with the SSD. - 22/10/2010 06:40:14 PM 816 Views
Re: If you're trying to conserve money, don't bother with the SSD. - 22/10/2010 06:56:58 PM 797 Views
If you're impatient, you'll notice the impact of the extra ram a lot more than the ssd. *NM* - 22/10/2010 06:58:56 PM 396 Views
Well it would help with switching between programs - 22/10/2010 07:03:47 PM 831 Views
Bullshit, the SSD will make more of a difference than the extra memory - 23/10/2010 04:38:44 AM 911 Views
Go with an i5 750/760 or an i7 860/870 - 23/10/2010 04:26:03 AM 870 Views
Also don't worry about sata 6.0 Gbps *NM* - 23/10/2010 04:26:24 AM 413 Views
A power surge is likely to corrupt your RAM as well, and possibly motherboard components. *NM* - 22/10/2010 06:39:06 PM 390 Views
I tested the RAM, it's fine. - 22/10/2010 07:00:27 PM 844 Views

Reply to Message