Active Users:1130 Time:30/11/2025 06:57:25 AM
On a gut level, I think all substance is teleologically tied to one or more kinds of consciousness. Burr Send a noteboard - 14/09/2009 04:03:31 PM
I infer that there are substances that I will never observe but some other conscious being has or will. And I imagine that God observes all, but maybe even he enjoys the occasional emergent surprise. If any of that fits with what you mean by "spiritual substance," then yes.

But not in any animist sense. I don't believe that souls exist as a special substance, for instance. I am just one of many examples of awesome physical programming.
||||||||||*MySmiley*
Only so evil.
Reply to message
Do you think there's some kind of spiritual substance in the universe? - 14/09/2009 02:42:22 PM 943 Views
no, it is mostly hydrogen *NM* - 14/09/2009 02:43:47 PM 296 Views
No *NM* - 14/09/2009 03:01:32 PM 275 Views
not a chance *NM* - 14/09/2009 03:23:02 PM 279 Views
yes (in as much that we could choose to define it that way) - 14/09/2009 03:31:40 PM 749 Views
On a gut level, I think all substance is teleologically tied to one or more kinds of consciousness. - 14/09/2009 04:03:31 PM 679 Views
aaah but who says we can percieve all there is to percieve in relation to our persons? - 14/09/2009 04:14:08 PM 682 Views
But merely positing a soul (as a spiritual substance) doesn't actually explain anything. - 14/09/2009 07:46:35 PM 622 Views
i'm not saying that all inexplained qualities are due to "soul" - 14/09/2009 07:50:27 PM 685 Views
Re: i'm not saying that all inexplained qualities are due to "soul" - 14/09/2009 08:05:41 PM 680 Views
Carts and horses. - 18/09/2009 12:10:22 PM 824 Views
No *NM* - 14/09/2009 05:14:33 PM 281 Views
Wouldn't spiritual and substance be mutually exclusive? - 14/09/2009 05:27:09 PM 683 Views
Re: Wouldn't spiritual and substance be mutually exclusive? - 14/09/2009 06:20:45 PM 668 Views
I think there is definitely a spiritual force that underlies the unity of all things - 14/09/2009 06:11:01 PM 714 Views
That sounds very like gnosticism in many ways. - 18/09/2009 12:17:51 PM 727 Views
No. *NM* - 14/09/2009 07:06:59 PM 272 Views
define "spiritual'. - 14/09/2009 07:36:18 PM 637 Views
Rum. - 14/09/2009 08:25:46 PM 688 Views
YES! *NM* - 16/09/2009 02:10:55 PM 304 Views
How are we not married? *NM* - 19/09/2009 04:10:13 AM 281 Views
Bigamy laws. *NM* - 19/09/2009 03:49:59 PM 283 Views
My Achilles heel! *NM* - 19/09/2009 07:30:06 PM 288 Views
Timing *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:51:37 PM 279 Views
My Achilles ankle! *NM* - 21/09/2009 08:14:42 PM 293 Views
Your Face. *NM* - 21/09/2009 08:21:44 PM 281 Views
My Achilles face! - 07/10/2009 09:40:36 PM 588 Views
No *NM* - 14/09/2009 09:09:16 PM 264 Views
No *NM* - 14/09/2009 09:31:14 PM 281 Views
Yes, vodka. *NM* - 14/09/2009 10:02:19 PM 268 Views
Substance? - 14/09/2009 10:08:04 PM 654 Views
Yeah, boobs. - 15/09/2009 01:51:44 AM 640 Views
Not the way I'd put it, as jh notes, but unquestionably. - 15/09/2009 03:17:22 PM 669 Views
Look, don't put words in my mouth. - 15/09/2009 04:50:13 PM 715 Views
Sorry. - 15/09/2009 05:14:10 PM 631 Views
Re: Sorry. - 17/09/2009 09:20:58 PM 610 Views
People over-complicate this, it's a sort of animal abuse - 15/09/2009 09:03:01 PM 669 Views
Nicely put. *NM* - 17/09/2009 01:57:44 AM 261 Views
Very nicely put. *NM* - 17/09/2009 06:57:57 PM 254 Views
A sublte nuance most modern materialists miss. - 18/09/2009 12:21:33 PM 888 Views
I think there may be platonic forms defining purpose - 16/09/2009 06:27:36 AM 589 Views
The material universe precludes a purely natural cause. - 18/09/2009 12:04:16 PM 785 Views
One little correction - 20/09/2009 12:34:13 AM 769 Views
Nay. - 20/09/2009 07:04:47 AM 608 Views
Re: Nay. - 07/10/2009 11:55:28 AM 720 Views

Reply to Message