I mean, I already wanted him gone for the personnel decisions he's made, but this should definitely do it. If it doesn't I don't think I can be a fan of this team, which I have been 25 years.
Basically, the Broncos were caught videotaping a 49'ers practice prior to the game in London. Remeber that McDaniels was part of the New England staff that got caught for the same thing. Oh, and the "I declined to view the videotape" excuse does not mean he didn't try to gain some benefit from it.
Basically, the Broncos were caught videotaping a 49'ers practice prior to the game in London. Remeber that McDaniels was part of the New England staff that got caught for the same thing. Oh, and the "I declined to view the videotape" excuse does not mean he didn't try to gain some benefit from it.
Seriously, if they didn't even bother saying that no one was allowed to watch them I don't see what one can hold against him.
--- signature starts here ---
I am the Demon of Delightfulness and Sinister Smirkings!
e^(πi)+1=0
identity named after the Terry Pratchett of 18th century mathematics
I am the Demon of Delightfulness and Sinister Smirkings!
e^(πi)+1=0
identity named after the Terry Pratchett of 18th century mathematics
Hopefully this will finally get McDaniels fired from the Broncos
- 27/11/2010 06:45:12 PM
976 Views
I think the evidence should be thrown out based on their sucking in that game. *NM*
- 27/11/2010 07:27:28 PM
233 Views
Was the session closed?
- 27/11/2010 08:06:28 PM
668 Views
The LEAGUE said no one could tape it, and virtually shouted it at the Cheatriots after Spygate.
- 28/11/2010 12:05:00 AM
605 Views
So they were allowed to watch but not tape?
- 28/11/2010 12:37:59 AM
606 Views
Well, I suppose they could spend all their time watching the '9ers practice if the skipped their own
- 28/11/2010 01:00:38 AM
611 Views
Or just send an extra guy there
- 28/11/2010 01:07:02 AM
606 Views
Probably would still be illegal, but I'm not sure it could be done so easily.
- 28/11/2010 02:22:52 AM
786 Views
Then why not practice behind closed doors?
- 28/11/2010 07:56:36 AM
670 Views
Normally they do, at least part of the time, but there were extenuating circumstances.
- 28/11/2010 12:13:23 PM
585 Views
My point is that all they'd have to do is tell the people running Wembley
- 29/11/2010 11:18:06 AM
572 Views
Closed practices are fairly common, but I'm not sure how it works when BOTH teams are "visitors".
- 29/11/2010 12:51:33 PM
624 Views
I presume they staggered the practices
- 29/11/2010 03:29:29 PM
538 Views
Logical, but there was a definite time crunch, which affected both teams.
- 29/11/2010 03:33:52 PM
665 Views
OMFG, someone must've dropped the boy genius on his head a few (dozen) times as a child.
- 28/11/2010 12:20:03 AM
621 Views
Well, John, here's hoping he doesn't get fired.
- 28/11/2010 05:13:06 PM
637 Views
Thanks for the invite 
- 28/11/2010 07:19:08 PM
649 Views
- 28/11/2010 07:19:08 PM
649 Views
Pretty sad when the Faders can tut tut Denver for poor sportsmanship though. 
- 29/11/2010 01:01:08 PM
657 Views
- 29/11/2010 01:01:08 PM
657 Views
Really?
- 29/11/2010 02:37:39 PM
641 Views
Cut blocks are legal, chop blocks aren't.
- 29/11/2010 03:29:33 PM
597 Views
cut blocks are illegal at the LOS and also sometimes in the open field depending on the play
- 30/11/2010 01:33:09 AM
614 Views
Have a source for that? 'Cos I can't find one.
- 30/11/2010 03:56:26 AM
729 Views
my mistake. cut blocking is only illegal if done below the knees
- 30/11/2010 05:09:11 AM
658 Views
No biggy; I only know 'cos Denver fans have to deal with these accusations a dozen times a year
- 30/11/2010 05:01:49 PM
718 Views