I assume they don't practice more than 3 hours straight, which means the stadium can fit in at least 3 training sessions per day without issue. For example one team would practice 10am-1pm, the other 2-5pm and the first one again 6-9pm, switched around the next day.
And I'm not sure what home vs away team does in the context of closed practice session or not?
And I'm not sure what home vs away team does in the context of closed practice session or not?
--- signature starts here ---
I am the Demon of Delightfulness and Sinister Smirkings!
e^(πi)+1=0
identity named after the Terry Pratchett of 18th century mathematics
I am the Demon of Delightfulness and Sinister Smirkings!
e^(πi)+1=0
identity named after the Terry Pratchett of 18th century mathematics
Hopefully this will finally get McDaniels fired from the Broncos
- 27/11/2010 06:45:12 PM
941 Views
I think the evidence should be thrown out based on their sucking in that game. *NM*
- 27/11/2010 07:27:28 PM
222 Views
Was the session closed?
- 27/11/2010 08:06:28 PM
637 Views
The LEAGUE said no one could tape it, and virtually shouted it at the Cheatriots after Spygate.
- 28/11/2010 12:05:00 AM
581 Views
So they were allowed to watch but not tape?
- 28/11/2010 12:37:59 AM
577 Views
Well, I suppose they could spend all their time watching the '9ers practice if the skipped their own
- 28/11/2010 01:00:38 AM
590 Views
Or just send an extra guy there
- 28/11/2010 01:07:02 AM
581 Views
Probably would still be illegal, but I'm not sure it could be done so easily.
- 28/11/2010 02:22:52 AM
744 Views
Then why not practice behind closed doors?
- 28/11/2010 07:56:36 AM
647 Views
Normally they do, at least part of the time, but there were extenuating circumstances.
- 28/11/2010 12:13:23 PM
563 Views
My point is that all they'd have to do is tell the people running Wembley
- 29/11/2010 11:18:06 AM
550 Views
Closed practices are fairly common, but I'm not sure how it works when BOTH teams are "visitors".
- 29/11/2010 12:51:33 PM
594 Views
I presume they staggered the practices
- 29/11/2010 03:29:29 PM
510 Views
Logical, but there was a definite time crunch, which affected both teams.
- 29/11/2010 03:33:52 PM
637 Views
OMFG, someone must've dropped the boy genius on his head a few (dozen) times as a child.
- 28/11/2010 12:20:03 AM
597 Views
Well, John, here's hoping he doesn't get fired.
- 28/11/2010 05:13:06 PM
610 Views
Thanks for the invite 
- 28/11/2010 07:19:08 PM
608 Views
- 28/11/2010 07:19:08 PM
608 Views
Pretty sad when the Faders can tut tut Denver for poor sportsmanship though. 
- 29/11/2010 01:01:08 PM
633 Views
- 29/11/2010 01:01:08 PM
633 Views
Really?
- 29/11/2010 02:37:39 PM
617 Views
Cut blocks are legal, chop blocks aren't.
- 29/11/2010 03:29:33 PM
570 Views
cut blocks are illegal at the LOS and also sometimes in the open field depending on the play
- 30/11/2010 01:33:09 AM
587 Views
Have a source for that? 'Cos I can't find one.
- 30/11/2010 03:56:26 AM
699 Views
my mistake. cut blocking is only illegal if done below the knees
- 30/11/2010 05:09:11 AM
633 Views
No biggy; I only know 'cos Denver fans have to deal with these accusations a dozen times a year
- 30/11/2010 05:01:49 PM
694 Views