No biggy; I only know 'cos Denver fans have to deal with these accusations a dozen times a year
Joel Send a noteboard - 30/11/2010 05:01:49 PM
you'd think the nfl would publish the 
rulebook so that people could read it for themselves and know what it contains. i guess they don't want to be responsible for people being able to settle disagreements with referees by using their own statutes against them or something... 
rulebook so that people could read it for themselves and know what it contains. i guess they don't want to be responsible for people being able to settle disagreements with referees by using their own statutes against them or something... Yeah, 'cos the Leagues part time volunteer refs need more headaches....
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Hopefully this will finally get McDaniels fired from the Broncos
- 27/11/2010 06:45:12 PM
976 Views
I think the evidence should be thrown out based on their sucking in that game. *NM*
- 27/11/2010 07:27:28 PM
233 Views
Was the session closed?
- 27/11/2010 08:06:28 PM
667 Views
The LEAGUE said no one could tape it, and virtually shouted it at the Cheatriots after Spygate.
- 28/11/2010 12:05:00 AM
605 Views
So they were allowed to watch but not tape?
- 28/11/2010 12:37:59 AM
605 Views
Well, I suppose they could spend all their time watching the '9ers practice if the skipped their own
- 28/11/2010 01:00:38 AM
610 Views
Or just send an extra guy there
- 28/11/2010 01:07:02 AM
605 Views
Probably would still be illegal, but I'm not sure it could be done so easily.
- 28/11/2010 02:22:52 AM
786 Views
Then why not practice behind closed doors?
- 28/11/2010 07:56:36 AM
670 Views
Normally they do, at least part of the time, but there were extenuating circumstances.
- 28/11/2010 12:13:23 PM
585 Views
My point is that all they'd have to do is tell the people running Wembley
- 29/11/2010 11:18:06 AM
572 Views
Closed practices are fairly common, but I'm not sure how it works when BOTH teams are "visitors".
- 29/11/2010 12:51:33 PM
624 Views
I presume they staggered the practices
- 29/11/2010 03:29:29 PM
538 Views
Logical, but there was a definite time crunch, which affected both teams.
- 29/11/2010 03:33:52 PM
665 Views
OMFG, someone must've dropped the boy genius on his head a few (dozen) times as a child.
- 28/11/2010 12:20:03 AM
621 Views
Well, John, here's hoping he doesn't get fired.
- 28/11/2010 05:13:06 PM
637 Views
Thanks for the invite
- 28/11/2010 07:19:08 PM
649 Views
- 28/11/2010 07:19:08 PM
649 Views
Pretty sad when the Faders can tut tut Denver for poor sportsmanship though. 
- 29/11/2010 01:01:08 PM
657 Views
- 29/11/2010 01:01:08 PM
657 Views
Really?
- 29/11/2010 02:37:39 PM
641 Views
Cut blocks are legal, chop blocks aren't.
- 29/11/2010 03:29:33 PM
597 Views
cut blocks are illegal at the LOS and also sometimes in the open field depending on the play
- 30/11/2010 01:33:09 AM
614 Views
Have a source for that? 'Cos I can't find one.
- 30/11/2010 03:56:26 AM
729 Views
my mistake. cut blocking is only illegal if done below the knees
- 30/11/2010 05:09:11 AM
658 Views
No biggy; I only know 'cos Denver fans have to deal with these accusations a dozen times a year
- 30/11/2010 05:01:49 PM
718 Views