Active Users:801 Time:17/02/2026 10:17:34 AM
I'm just carrying on a conversation. Dreaded Anomaly Send a noteboard - 05/12/2010 07:26:39 AM
I am not a religious person although I am spiritual. I have no problem with science and evolution makes sense to me. It is the attitude of some scientists that bothers me. The attitude of some religious people bothers me too. In both groups it is the ones that don't just think that they re right and that everyone else is wrong but but also feel the need to be vocal about their lack of respect for the view points of others.


Respecting someone's right to hold a view, and respecting the view itself are two different things. Views are worthy or unworthy of respect based on their merit, not just their existence.

You spoke of believing in things because of evidence. I have mounds of personal evidence that God exists. On the other hand I have to take other people's word for it that men walked on the moon. The two are not mutually exclusive. I am just pointing out that much of what we are told by science are things that the vast majority of us have to take on faith as we don't have the time or means to prove it ourselves. It isn't so different from people believing in various religious concepts. Just something to think about before you bash the other side. I don't even see where there has to be two sides. It isn't hard to embrace both.


The difference between the two types of evidence is falsifiability. You could, in theory, check if men walked on the moon. No one can can check your personal evidence for God's existence. (I discuss this in reply to Nate's post above.) It isn't hard to embrace both sides because humans can live with a certain amount of cognitive dissonance, but that doesn't make it a good thing.

This is far from what I was originally saying that I didn't think it was such a stretch that their may be other manifestations of life out there besides the ones we are familiar with.


I agree that it's not a stretch. We can't possibly imagine all the forms life could take. That's not really why this discovery is noteworthy; it's because now we have proof of a new (or at least altered) form.
Reply to message
More Important Than Soccer: Completely new type of DNA discovered - 02/12/2010 04:48:51 PM 1676 Views
that is TOTALLY inappropriate - 02/12/2010 04:58:47 PM 882 Views
Of course there is... - 02/12/2010 05:02:30 PM 890 Views
I saw, I'm just not in the proper habit yet - 02/12/2010 05:35:33 PM 997 Views
Crazy awesome. - 02/12/2010 05:07:49 PM 948 Views
Re: Crazy awesome. - 02/12/2010 10:32:56 PM 797 Views
It's confusing, that's for sure. - 03/12/2010 02:01:11 AM 792 Views
lol, or maybe not - 09/12/2010 07:49:19 PM 1161 Views
So the movie Evolution was real! - 02/12/2010 05:24:16 PM 882 Views
Nice reference, but not quite. - 02/12/2010 10:32:04 PM 826 Views
Thanks for clearing that up - 02/12/2010 11:23:36 PM 934 Views
Wow. *NM* - 02/12/2010 05:32:08 PM 498 Views
I love how it was found in a massively polluted lake - 02/12/2010 05:35:22 PM 821 Views
The answer to your question is: Pretty damn cool. *NM* - 02/12/2010 05:33:54 PM 482 Views
Goddamnit I am SO PISSED that I have a meeting at 2!!! - 02/12/2010 05:50:21 PM 781 Views
I won't pretend I know enough about biology to understand the impact of this - 02/12/2010 06:26:24 PM 939 Views
It's like finding a type of rock that eats laughter - 02/12/2010 06:51:15 PM 788 Views
I think I had an ex once that was made of arsenic. *NM* - 02/12/2010 07:10:57 PM 450 Views
Maris? *NM* - 02/12/2010 07:33:14 PM 492 Views
Well you are made of poison, so that makes sense. *NM* - 02/12/2010 07:39:09 PM 452 Views
Curse you, poetic justice! Curse you! - 04/12/2010 03:38:37 AM 974 Views
So, is it an alien? - 02/12/2010 07:19:49 PM 932 Views
I don't see why it couldn't be natural - 02/12/2010 07:22:49 PM 835 Views
They haven't mentioned anything saying it's not from Earth, I think - 02/12/2010 08:03:44 PM 950 Views
It was funded by NASA, I think - 02/12/2010 08:15:15 PM 971 Views
lols. *NM* - 02/12/2010 08:17:40 PM 466 Views
The bacteria in question is part of a known lineage - 02/12/2010 08:07:34 PM 1165 Views
see my note below - 02/12/2010 08:13:35 PM 944 Views
Maybe - 02/12/2010 08:23:16 PM 870 Views
it could be there are some in the lake naturally - 02/12/2010 09:00:42 PM 788 Views
Huh! I must have missed that part. *NM* - 02/12/2010 09:05:15 PM 452 Views
No it isn't! - 02/12/2010 07:39:34 PM 947 Views
I really didn't understand that, either. - 04/12/2010 10:44:51 AM 961 Views
So, apparently, this bacteria doesn't use arsneic for its DNA in its natural state? - 02/12/2010 08:06:02 PM 839 Views
While awesome, it's a bit of a problem. - 02/12/2010 09:04:22 PM 839 Views
Re: While awesome, it's a bit of a problem. - 02/12/2010 10:34:34 PM 775 Views
It's interesting, but not completely shocking - 02/12/2010 08:08:46 PM 1017 Views
I don't understand why this is such a big deal. It always seemed common sense to me that there are - 02/12/2010 10:40:22 PM 986 Views
It's much more than an educated guess. - 02/12/2010 11:59:18 PM 1019 Views
You can't "know" from this distance. - 03/12/2010 03:13:05 AM 761 Views
Why not? - 03/12/2010 04:42:15 AM 1024 Views
obviously you have not learned to look at the back label on the car *NM* - 04/12/2010 07:04:42 PM 423 Views
Yes, we can. - 04/12/2010 06:04:48 PM 1187 Views
The problem probably is with me. - 04/12/2010 08:00:56 PM 835 Views
No, they aren't. - 04/12/2010 10:01:25 PM 849 Views
Depends on how you view evidence, no? - 05/12/2010 04:50:11 AM 1088 Views
There are correct and incorrect ways to view evidence. - 05/12/2010 05:42:41 AM 791 Views
Are you baiting me to bait you? - 05/12/2010 06:41:49 AM 1022 Views
I'm just carrying on a conversation. - 05/12/2010 07:26:39 AM 1026 Views
Re: I'm just carrying on a conversation. - 05/12/2010 07:08:04 PM 810 Views
Re: I'm just carrying on a conversation. - 05/12/2010 07:56:43 PM 1000 Views
Re: I'm just carrying on a conversation. - 06/12/2010 03:15:37 AM 960 Views
Re: I'm just carrying on a conversation. - 06/12/2010 09:18:51 PM 872 Views
Okay. - 06/12/2010 11:22:44 PM 1039 Views
I watched that and was very intrigued - 03/12/2010 01:31:29 AM 711 Views
It's neat, but I object to the circus act - 03/12/2010 02:52:46 AM 967 Views
yah, and it's kind of shooting themselves in the foot anyways - 03/12/2010 09:10:21 AM 837 Views
xkcd - 03/12/2010 10:35:24 AM 999 Views

Reply to Message